The Chinese University of Hong Kong - CUHK vs Sopot University of Applied Sciences vs Wroclaw Medical University - UMW vs Govt Shaheed Smrity College - GSS College vs State University of Malang - UM
Side-by-side comparison from 52 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse academic programs and interdisciplinary learning opportunities
- +Helpful professors and a supportive learning environment
- +Excellent campus facilities and efficient transportation
- +Supportive and accessible professors and staff.
- +Small class sizes and individual attention.
- +High-quality teaching and professional lecturers.
- +Good facilities and infrastructure for learning.
- +Vibrant student life with an international community.
- +Friendly and helpful teachers
- +Positive social environment and friendships
- +Supportive and inspiring faculty
- +Affordable cost of living and study
- +Positive and student-friendly city environment
- +High-quality lectures and professional staff
- +Affordable tuition fees
- +Positive study environment and connections
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including lack of student input in leadership selection.
- -Inadequate and unreliable facilities, such as poor WiFi and insufficient laundry machines.
- -Inconvenient campus infrastructure and transportation that hinders student mobility.
- -Ineffective administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Poor communication and lack of clarity on important information are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers learning effectively.
- -Inadequate and poorly maintained facilities, especially restrooms.
- -Insufficient parking availability.
- -Inefficient administrative processes.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and support from faculty is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
This university exhibits a generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving scores above 4.2. **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated category with a score of 3.625, indicating room for improvement in this aspect compared to other surveyed areas.
This institution achieves exceptional scores, particularly in **Professors**, **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect marks. Areas like **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation** are also strong, earning a solid 4 out of 5. No significant weaknesses are identified in this rating set, indicating a well-rounded and highly regarded academic environment.
This university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in **Location** with a score of 4.79. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also receive high marks, both above 4.28. The weakest area appears to be **Internationality**, scoring 4.07. **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated competently, with scores around 4.14 and 4.21 respectively. **Value** is also well-regarded at 4.36.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, most notably for its **Professors and Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation are also well-regarded, each earning a solid 4. The university's weakest area, however, lies in its **Internationality**, which received a moderate rating of 3. Overall, the Value for money is rated positively at 4.
This institution receives very strong marks in several key areas, notably Professors and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life also garners significant praise at 4.6. Location stands out as a perfect 5. Facilities and Accomodation are rated well, around 4.17 and 4.33 respectively. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.83.
This university presents a commendable overall profile. Its strongest areas are Professors and Location, both receiving a high score of 3.86. Student Life also fares well at 3.67. While Facilities and Accomodation are rated at a solid 3.43 and 3.57 respectively, Internationality emerges as the weakest point with a rating of 3.14. Value is also moderately rated at 3.57.
Nothing to show
Most reviews are positive (~87%), praising the university's top rankings, diverse college system, and extensive facilities. A few negative comments (~13%) mentioned issues with WiFi and limited laundry facilities.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for professors' dedication and helpful staff, fostering individualized attention in small groups. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.07/5 from 14 reviews, ~86% are positive. Recurring themes praise high-quality lectures, good infrastructure, and numerous opportunities. Students also highlight Wrocław as a great city for student life and the diverse international community.
This university has a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review. The positive feedback (~100%) highlights enjoyment and supportive, kind teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
~83% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and a nurturing learning environment. Some students also highlight affordable living costs and a green, well-maintained campus. A small portion (~17%) of negative feedback points to inadequate facilities, including poor-quality toilets and a lack of parking.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback being 4–5 stars. Students highlight quality lectures and a good study environment. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
I don't know if it's because I major in Computer Science, but most of the professors who are in charge of the major courses teach very well. They have detailed explanations with step-by-step examples that are easy to learn. The student body is mostly locals and mainlanders but you can definitely find your own niche with international students as well and make friends from India, Indonesia, and Korea. I lived in CWChu College. They had three washing machines and four driers with a balcony where you could dry your clothes below the sun. The machines are usually free if its not near the weekends. The college is quite isolated but I'd say its facilities is one of the best. The food around university is mediocre, but you could eat out once a week and you should be fine. The food won't fit you if you have high standards. The campus is also the best in Hong Kong and the most university-like in terms of scale. The campus is closely intertwined with nature and you can definitely see and feel the greenness well. The buildings are quite old but they serve their purpose. In my opinion, CUHK is a decent university with great professors and students.
Nothing to show
Overall i like my university. Most of the classes are interesting although there are some that i see as useless. Nevertheless an enormous plus of my uni are the professors as about 90% of them are fine teachers that do not try to fail you.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Gombe State University is one of the most pornounced tertiary institutions across the North-eastern part of Nigeria. It was this same reputation that led me to apply - so I can verify for myself whether the assertion is true or not. Upon enrolling here as a student, I discovered that everything I heard about this institution is absolutely true. From the quality of lectures delivered by its well-seasoned staff
Nothing to show
