Technical University of Kenya vs United States International University Africa - USIU vs Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology - JKUAT vs Kenya Methodist University - KeMU vs Daystar University
Side-by-side comparison from 284 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, hands-on technical education
- +Quality of lecturers and specialized equipment
- +Strong industry integration and career preparation
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Diverse and enriching student community
- +Strong STEM, agriculture, and technology programmes
- +Supportive academic environment and practical learning
- +Positive student experience and sense of community
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Welcoming community and engaging learning environment
- +Good facilities and accessible location
- +Student-centered approach and preparedness for disruptions
- +Engaging and practical academic programs with knowledgeable lecturers
- +Welcoming and supportive learning environment for personal growth
- +Flexible and adaptable virtual learning options
- +International reach and diverse student/lecturer base
- +Commitment to inclusivity through scholarships
- +Enriching curriculum and hands-on projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Flexible learning options (hybrid/online)
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are not universally well-equipped for all courses.
- -Lack of recommendation for the university overall.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency exacerbate existing problems.
- -Lack of faculty support and guidance.
- -Repetitive or theoretical coursework.
- -Issues with program management and limited career prospects.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Excessive and unclear administrative policies cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
- -A lack of adequate support and resources hinders student success.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized.
This university garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably location (4.36) and professors (4.33). Value for money also scores highly at 4.27. The institution's weakest points appear to be accommodation (3.31) and student life (3.76). Internationality sits in the middle ground at 3.83.
This institution garners impressive scores across various aspects, with Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality all achieving near-perfect ratings of 4.7. Professors and Value also stand out with scores above 4.5. The weakest area, though still solid, is Accomodation, with a rating of 4.33.
This institution garners notable strengths in its **Location**, **Professors**, and **Value**, all receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category stands out as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Internationality is rated moderately well. Overall, the university presents a strong academic and environmental offering, with room for improvement in housing.
This institution garners strong feedback across its offerings, with an exceptional score for Location and Value. Professors also received high marks. Conversely, Internationality is its relatively weakest area, though still rated well. Facilities, Student Life, and Accomodation all achieved solid, consistent scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
This institution receives high marks across most surveyed areas, with "Value" being the strongest at 4.51. "Facilities" also score exceptionally well at 4.46. "Internationality" and "Professors" are also rated favorably. The weakest area identified is "Accomodation," receiving a score of 3.9. "Student Life" and "Location" fall within a similarly mid-range, solid performance.
This institution presents a compelling profile, excelling in its prime location, vibrant student life, excellent accommodation options, strong international presence, and exceptional value, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its facilities represent the sole area for improvement, scoring a respectable but comparatively lower three. Professors are also highly regarded, earning a near-perfect 4.5.
This institution showcases impressive strengths, particularly in its **Facilities**, earning a perfect score. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also stand out with highly positive ratings. The university's **Location** and **Internationality** are well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category presents the most significant area for potential improvement, receiving the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.
With an average rating of 4.23/5 from 30 reviews, approximately 97% are positive. Students praise practical learning, technical programs, and experienced faculty. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with specific course equipment and administrative helpfulness.
Nearly all (nearly 100%) of 46 reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, practical learning, and a supportive environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 based on 146 reviews, ~92% of students highlight strong academic programs and a supportive learning environment. A small minority (~2%) mentioned occasional administrative or faculty support challenges.
Students highly praise the university, citing knowledgeable and engaging lecturers, a strong sense of community, and supportive facilities as key strengths. The academic environment is described as rigorous yet welcoming.
With an average rating of 4.46/5, ~97.6% of reviews are positive. Students praise student-centered approaches, prepared remote learning, engaging academics, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned institutional influences.
Both reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight the university's swift adaptability, particularly its successful transition to virtual studies during COVID-19, and its inclusive scholarship opportunities. The e-learning system is praised for its global reach and powerful teaching methods.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 stars, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students found the program enriching and the faculty supportive, appreciating hands-on projects and flexible learning options like hybrid and online classes.
The university is a very popular one as it is located in the CBD of the capital city of Kenya, which is Nairobi for the ones who might not know such details.It is easily accessible and its security is above average as it is also near the central bank of Kenya. The university has a huge number of students doing various courses, it's fees are average and not too expensive to study in. Lecturers are well informed on what they teach and are always hands on with their classes . I also do believe that the school facilities could be updated more although they are not that bad they could be better too if effort by the admin was put to work. Yes I would recommend the university to anyone interested.
If I had to rate USIU I would rate it 8/10. my experience so far has been good overall. What I enjoy most is the classroom interactions with the class and the lecturer. I also like the diversity of religions, cultures, and overall personalities. Some of my dislikes are they don't have a vast variety of food at the University. I would gladly recommend it.
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology is one of the best universities in Kenya, as a personal opinion and one that is recommended nationally. I went there first because it was a few kilometres away from home and I wanted the experience of living alone and generally to feel like an adult. It was home away from home, that I even stayed one year later even after graduation. The lecturers were quite tough which was a good thing because I almost didn't graduate because I had missed a few classes. All my practical units that required extra coursework outside class always had the lecturers in attendance even when they didn't have to. My lecturers were very friendly and very practical on what the course I did would translate to once I finished. The security was very good especially for a single female young lady miles away from home. There was plenty of room to study, from parks all around the university, the student centre and the library. You could also easily access help from the administration and get to the staff offices for extra help from our lectures without going through loops. I loved it there and yes, I would recommend it to a family or friend, depending on the course they plan to do. I was an introvert in campus but I remember trying things like rollball, table tennis, pool, drama which are available and active even till date.
Nothing to show
Daystar University gtaught me the importance of expressing myself and respectfully disagreeing with opinions that i djid not subscribe to. The university taught me that as much as i am leader i should not be afraid to be hands on on any given task in life and work space. A servant leader leads by example and does not instill fear to those he is leading.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show