London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of the Arts London - UAL vs Brunel University London vs University of the West of Scotland - UWS vs Ravensbourne University London

Side-by-side comparison from 574 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 2/7 categories
University of the Arts London - UAL: wins 1/7 categories
Brunel University London: wins 2/7 categories
University of the West of Scotland - UWS: wins 0/7 categories
Ravensbourne University London: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
London School of Planning and Management - LSPM: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
72 reviews
×
Best programme: Art History
London, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
119 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Human Resource Management
London, The United Kingdom
3.90
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Animation
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.14
4.16
4.17
4.23
4.40
Win
Not rated
Location
4.78
Win
4.23
3.99
3.83
4.40
4.70
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.06
4.03
4.42
4.08
4.60
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.19
4.33
4.32
4.00
4.60
Not rated
Student life
3.65
4.11
Win
4.08
3.50
3.46
3.90
Not rated
Value
4.05
3.77
4.13
Win
4.10
3.85
3.90
Not rated
Accommodation
3.80
3.61
3.84
Win
3.43
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive faculty and friendly learning environment
  • +Practical skills and real-world application of knowledge
  • +Diverse community and networking opportunities
  • +Practical, career-focused learning with industry relevance
  • +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
  • +Accessible campus and useful resources
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
  • +Engaging, innovative, and comprehensive course content
  • +Vibrant campus life and diverse student community
  • +Industry-focused approach and real-world projects
  • +Modern facilities and high-tech creative equipment
  • +Strong industry connections and career preparation
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unfair grading and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and overcrowded classes.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and irrelevant feedback from tutors.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated course content and confusing teaching methods are frustrating.
  • -Poor communication and lack of professionalism are prevalent.
  • -Lack of academic and administrative support.
  • -Ineffective teaching and unclear assignment guidance.
  • -Insufficient time for major projects.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major concerns.
  • -Ineffective communication and unclear expectations cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

This university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a rating of 4.19 and **Facilities** at 4.14. **Student Life** also received a commendable score of 4.11. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating at 3.61, followed by **Value** at 3.77. Other aspects like Professors and Location also scored positively, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.

This institution garners a strong overall rating, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.33. **Professors** and **Value** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Location** present the weakest areas, scoring 3.61 and 3.72 respectively. Facilities, student life, and professors all fall within a commendable 3.8 to 4.0 range.

Demonstrating robust strengths in key areas, this university excels with particularly high marks for its professors and internationality. Facilities and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, student life and accommodation present as areas for potential improvement, receiving the lowest scores. Location also shows room for enhancement.

Assessing various university aspects reveals a mixed picture. The institution excels in its **location**, scoring a high 4.4. **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive strong marks, indicating well-equipped campuses and effective teaching. Student life offers a moderate experience, while **internationality** stands at a solid 4.0. The weakest area is **accommodation**, with a rating of 3, suggesting room for improvement in student housing. Overall value is rated moderately well.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 72 reviews, ~85% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive staff, diverse communities, and practical learning. Negative feedback (~3%) cites poor support and course quality.

Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting career-focused degrees, practical learning, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions visa issues and course content clarity.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable courses, supportive faculty, and a lively student environment. A single negative review mentioned a lack of course support and unhelpful lecturers.

Approximately 100% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-focused learning and modern, inspiring creative facilities. Students appreciate the university's strong industry connections and hands-on approach.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
33%
32%
39%
23%
60%
0%
4★
44%
51%
55%
36%
46%
40%
0%
3★
18%
13%
10%
21%
31%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
3%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Cosmetic Science in UAL

I took a three months internship in UAL, London. I developed a project in the cosmetics area through my Erasmus Program. I'm just glad I took this opportunity because it was a lifetime experience. UAL is a great university and London College of Fashion is a great college. The course Cosmetic Science should be more recognised because it is really interesting.

Nothing to show

More programme coordination

The lecturers in my programme are quite helpful. Would recommend they infuse some kind of practice or practicality into the program. A little bit of programme coordination, and more interaction with peers should be incorporated.

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close