Imperial College London vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of the Arts London - UAL vs University of Westminster vs Brunel University London
Side-by-side comparison from 881 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Top-tier research and academics
- +Accessible education and diverse opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and supportive environment
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Supportive faculty and friendly learning environment
- +Practical skills and real-world application of knowledge
- +Diverse community and networking opportunities
- +Strong foundation in diverse business & marketing programmes
- +Approachable and supportive faculty
- +Vibrant, diverse campus with community engagement
- +Practical, career-focused learning with industry relevance
- +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
- +Accessible campus and useful resources
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- -Limited campus size and food quality are disappointing.
- -Outdated facilities and management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unfair grading and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and overcrowded classes.
- -Poor quality of teaching and irrelevant feedback from tutors.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and delayed feedback.
- -Disengaging teaching quality with unmotivated lecturers and flawed course structures.
- -Inconsistent and disappointing delivery of lectures and practicals.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated course content and confusing teaching methods are frustrating.
- -Poor communication and lack of professionalism are prevalent.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
This university demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both scoring exceptionally high. **Facilities** also receive favorable marks. On the other hand, **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are areas where ratings are comparatively lower. The university also scores well in **Professors** and **Value**, indicating a generally positive academic and financial experience for students.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a rating of 4.19 and **Facilities** at 4.14. **Student Life** also received a commendable score of 4.11. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating at 3.61, followed by **Value** at 3.77. Other aspects like Professors and Location also scored positively, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.
This university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Student Life** and **Accommodations** represent areas with room for improvement, receiving the lowest ratings. Overall, the institution garners favorable marks for its facilities, professors, and value.
This institution garners a strong overall rating, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.33. **Professors** and **Value** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Location** present the weakest areas, scoring 3.61 and 3.72 respectively. Facilities, student life, and professors all fall within a commendable 3.8 to 4.0 range.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 from 245 reviews, ~91.4% of feedback is positive. Students praise top-level research, accessible scholarships, and great resources, including lecturers and campus facilities. Minimal negative feedback exists.
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 72 reviews, ~85% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive staff, diverse communities, and practical learning. Negative feedback (~3%) cites poor support and course quality.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 105 reviews, approximately 93% are positive, highlighting a diverse campus, approachable faculty, and engaging courses. Two reviews, about 1.9%, expressed concerns regarding some department teaching passion and feedback communication.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting career-focused degrees, practical learning, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions visa issues and course content clarity.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
The University included different subjects which suitable for different person. Professors are nice and professional. When You have any questions, they are always ready to help and discuss with you. You can enjoy the study environment, the facilities in campus is in very good condition.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I took a three months internship in UAL, London. I developed a project in the cosmetics area through my Erasmus Program. I'm just glad I took this opportunity because it was a lifetime experience. UAL is a great university and London College of Fashion is a great college. The course Cosmetic Science should be more recognised because it is really interesting.
During my first year at the university of Westminster I was able to come to three conclusions. The first one is that the university is a great place to connect to people from all around the world, is it also a great place to find friends and teachers that help you find yourself. Second conclusion is that it is not always so fun and beautiful, it is a hard path, where you learn how to be responsible, and that every action that you take for your future has a consequence. It is also a great place to learn from your mistakes and become a better person, you get in contact with different people that teach you many things. Third conclusion is that it is a very cozy place, I love my university because it has a nice and cozy vibe, it is a modern building but inside is very nice. I love how the institution tries to make its students feel comfortable inside.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
