Agricultural University of Kraków - UR vs RV University vs Joaquim Chissano University - UJC vs Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM vs Universidade São Tomás

Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM (4.00)
Agricultural University of Kraków - UR: wins 0/7 categories
RV University: wins 0/7 categories
Joaquim Chissano University - UJC: wins 0/7 categories
Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM: wins 1/7 categories
Universidade São Tomás: wins 2/7 categories
Polytechnic University Maputo - apolitécnica: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad UniverMilenium: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Bangalore, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
3.81
Not rated
Not rated
3.20
3.00
2.00
4.00
Win
Location
3.88
Not rated
Not rated
3.25
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
Professors
3.81
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
4.00
2.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.73
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
Win
3.00
3.00
4.00
Student life
3.84
Not rated
Not rated
3.40
3.00
2.00
5.00
Win
Value
3.85
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
5.00
Win
2.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.85
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
2.00
4.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty expertise and support
  • +Practical, hands-on learning opportunities
  • +Supportive and welcoming campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality and qualified professors
  • +Free tuition and accessible entry
  • +Good reputation and campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and communication problems.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Insufficient resources and support for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates a generally positive reception across key areas. Location stands out as the strongest point, receiving the highest rating. Internationality is the weakest, though still within a favorable range. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value all received very similar and solid scores, indicating a consistent experience across these important aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The highest marks were achieved in **Value** (4.6) and **Professors** and **Internationality** (both 4.2), indicating significant strengths in these areas. Conversely, the university received its lowest scores for **Accomodation** (3), followed closely by **Facilities** and **Location** (both 3.2). Student life received a moderate rating of 3.4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews). Students praise faculty, well-organized courses, and practical opportunities. The average rating is 3.77/5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a ~4/5 average rating, nearly all reviews praise the university's qualified staff and academic quality. Some mention challenges like course length and subject availability.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
4%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
4★
69%
0%
0%
60%
0%
0%
0%
3★
27%
0%
0%
20%
100%
100%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close