Hochschule Fulda University of Applied Sciences vs University of Bremen vs London School of Planning and Management - LSPM vs Joaquim Chissano University - UJC vs Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Bremen (4.50)
Hochschule Fulda University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
University of Bremen: wins 5/7 categories
London School of Planning and Management - LSPM: wins 0/7 categories
Joaquim Chissano University - UJC: wins 0/7 categories
Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM: wins 0/7 categories
Universidade São Tomás: wins 2/7 categories
Polytechnic University Maputo - apolitécnica: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Bremen, Germany
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Information Sciences
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.55
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.20
3.00
2.00
Location
3.67
4.45
Not rated
Not rated
3.25
5.00
Win
3.00
Professors
4.17
4.55
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
4.00
2.00
Internationality
3.83
4.45
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.00
4.64
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.40
3.00
2.00
Value
3.83
4.45
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
5.00
Win
2.00
Accommodation
3.17
4.09
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Student-friendly environment and personal growth focus
  • +Balanced theory and practical learning with excellent facilities
  • +Welcoming global community and affordability
  • +Flexible academic structure and supportive learning environment
  • +Engaging and interdisciplinary curriculum with diverse assessment methods
  • +Research opportunities and practical learning experiences

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality and qualified professors
  • +Free tuition and accessible entry
  • +Good reputation and campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are often perceived as lacking relevance or effectiveness.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and communication problems.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Insufficient resources and support for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university garners strong scores in several key areas, notably Facilities and Student Life, both receiving a 4. Professors are also highly rated at 4.17. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.17. Internationality and Value are similarly moderate, each at 3.83, while Location scores a 3.67.

This institution garners strong acclaim, particularly excelling in Student Life with a rating of 4.64. Professors and Facilities also received exceptionally high scores, both at 4.55. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the comparatively weakest area, scoring 4.09. The university presents a generally positive image, with other aspects like Location, Internationality, and Value also scoring favorably around 4.45.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The highest marks were achieved in **Value** (4.6) and **Professors** and **Internationality** (both 4.2), indicating significant strengths in these areas. Conversely, the university received its lowest scores for **Accomodation** (3), followed closely by **Facilities** and **Location** (both 3.2). Student life received a moderate rating of 3.4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5 from 6 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students highlight student-friendliness, strong academic programs with practical learning, and a good campus environment. There is no negative feedback.

With a ~91% positive sentiment, students highly recommend the University of Bremen. They praise its supportive learning environment, flexible courses, manageable exams, and excellent research opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a ~4/5 average rating, nearly all reviews praise the university's qualified staff and academic quality. Some mention challenges like course length and subject availability.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
64%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
4★
33%
27%
0%
0%
60%
0%
0%
3★
33%
9%
0%
0%
20%
100%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close