Stockholm University - SU vs Royal Institute of Technology - KTH vs Stockholm Business School vs Dalarna University vs Stockholm School of Economics - SSE
Side-by-side comparison from 47 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring and knowledgeable professors
- +Engaging and flexible course content
- +Supportive campus environment
- +World-class facilities and inspiring study atmosphere
- +Strong academic programs with practical application and flexibility
- +Engaging and approachable instructors
- +Excellent teaching quality and global student community
- +Broadened horizons and expanded knowledge in business and political science
- +Abundant working opportunities to offset living costs
- +University's quality and campus facilities.
Nothing to show
- +Hands-on, immersive, and creative learning with freedom to shape studies.
- +Direct industry insights and practical application from experienced professionals.
- +Strong focus on building relationships with driven, like-minded peers.
- +Industry-focused, unique programs with international connections.
- +Excellent, knowledgeable professors with high student expectations.
- -Poor administrative and management responsiveness to student issues.
- -Lack of adequate support for academic and personal conflicts.
- -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of engagement
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of effective communication and unclear expectations are problematic.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues create unnecessary hurdles.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and inconsistent policies lead to frustration.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie with its professors, receiving a strong rating of 4.24. Value and facilities also scored well, both above 4.1. Conversely, the location was the least favorably rated category at 3.77. Student life and accommodation are rated at a solid 4 and 3.85 respectively.
Exceptional marks were awarded in several key areas, notably a perfect score for **Internationality**. **Facilities** and **Value** also received very high ratings. The university performs well across **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, with solid scores for **Professors** and **Location**. While no area received a low rating, **Location** represents the comparatively weakest aspect among the surveyed categories.
This institution shines with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality. Student Life also receives a strong endorsement. However, Accomodation and Value for money present areas for potential improvement, indicated by their lower ratings compared to other aspects of the university experience.
This institution presents a mixed rating profile. Its strongest areas include professors and value, both receiving a solid 3.5. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, scoring a low 2. Facilities and internationality are rated moderately at 2.5, while location and student life achieve a respectable 3.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value. Professors and Internationality also received high marks, rated at 4 and 4.5 respectively. Accomodation stands out as the comparatively weakest area, though still very good at 4.5, reflecting a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.
With overwhelmingly positive feedback, this institution excels particularly in its **professors, location, internationality, and value, all receiving perfect scores**. Its **facilities and accommodation are also highly regarded**, earning a strong 4 out of 5. The primary area for improvement appears to be **student life**, which, while still good, is rated slightly lower at 3.
With an average rating of 4.11/5, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising approachable and knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and good campus life. A small percentage of negative feedback exists.
All 12 reviews are positive, averaging 4.75/5. Students praise world-class research facilities, inclusive culture, and opportunities for theory-practice integration. Friendly, engaging instructors and diverse, flexible courses are also highlighted.
This university garners a 4/5 average rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students praise exceptional teaching quality and opportunities for personal and academic growth.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, most feedback is positive (~100%). One student found the Borlänge campus building great but struggled with obtaining student information through confused online platforms.
Nothing to show
Both university reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight the immersive, hands-on approach, freedom to shape studies, and the opportunity to build relationships. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative.
This university garners an average rating of 4/5, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent professors and unique, industry-collaborative programs.
SU is a quite vibrant school and I am quite satisfied so far. I believed my programme can help unlock multiple career prospects in the future, The professors are kind and always willing to provide assistance.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
