Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Danish School of Media and Journalism - DMJX vs St. John Fisher College vs Rongo University vs Fisher College
Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +High reputation and demanding admission
- +Valuable internships and international opportunities
- +Strong sense of community and personal professor attention
- +High-quality educational programs
- +Vibrant campus atmosphere and entertainment
- +Dedicated and friendly professors/lecturers
- +Student voice through leaders and presentations
- +Growth in facilities and resources
- +Comfortable online learning experience
- +Rigorous and relevant curriculum
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Authentic university experience and community
Nothing to show
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities and resources are frequently described as outdated or insufficient.
- -Course content and teaching methods are sometimes perceived as uninspiring or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently criticized.
- -A general lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hindered learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations led to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
An examination of the university's performance reveals consistent mediocrity. Across all surveyed categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, the institution received a rating of zero. This indicates no identifiable strengths or weaknesses, with every aspect performing at the lowest possible level. The complete absence of positive or negative distinctions suggests a uniform and unexceptional standing.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas with lower scores, both rated at 3. Location and accommodation sit in the middle range at 3.5. Overall, the university offers a strong academic and resource foundation, though social and international engagement could be enhanced.
Academic and social experiences at this institution are highly regarded. Professors and student life received the strongest scores, both at 4.625. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the areas with the lowest ratings, averaging around 3.86. The university also scores well in location and value, indicating a positive overall perception across most key aspects.
Examining the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive outlook. The institution excels in its professors and value for money, both scoring a strong 3.67. Facilities, location, and internationality also perform well, averaging 3.33. Student life and accommodation represent the weakest areas, each receiving a rating of 3.
Overall, this university garners favorable ratings across various aspects. The strongest area appears to be **Professors**, with an impressive score. Other well-regarded categories include Accomodation and Student Life. The lowest-scoring areas, though still decent, are Internationality and Value, both receiving identical ratings.
Nothing to show
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
With a single review, the Danish School of Media and Journalism has a 4/5 rating, indicating approximately 100% positive sentiment. The positive feedback highlights a strong reputation and a well-structured bachelor's program with internships.
Based on two reviews, the university is highly regarded, with a 4.5/5 average rating. Students praise its tight-knit community, personalized professor attention, and high-quality education, especially within its pharmacy program. There's a strong emphasis on community service.
Reviews are largely positive (~75%) with a 4.25/5 average rating. Students praise dedicated lecturers and student platforms. A small amount of negative feedback was noted.
With one positive review and no negative feedback, student sentiment leans positive. The average rating is 3.33/5. The sole positive comment highlights a comfortable and amazing online learning experience.
All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students praise academic excellence, dedicated faculty, and a strong sense of community. Some mention outdated course content and concerns about lecturer harassment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The Danish School of Media and Journalism has a very good reputation. It has a reputation (in Denmark at least) that it is hard to be accepted to the school. There are different educations offered at DMJX and I took a bachelor in communication. It's a broad education which includes 2 times 6 months internships and an international semester. It's 7 semesters long - 3,5 years. I must admit despite the school's good reputation a lot of things didn't go according to plan and at the point, the classes were too easy. The school had bad communication itself; even kept in mind, that the communications education is new there - I hope they have improved this. Other than that it IS a good school, which will soon move to new buildings from the iconic one it "lives" in now.
Nothing to show
Rongo University is located on the western region of Kenya. During my time there, my journey as a student was filled with interesting turns. From academic, to socio-cultural to the local political arena, my experiences there molded me to be the person that I am today. I don't regret a single moment.
Nothing to show
I have graduated from the National University of Lesotho. Is the oldest and biggest nation's University and one of the best. Though there are still a lot of issues in the functioning of the University, I would still consider it as one of the best in Lesotho. Definitely! I would recommend any one to study at NUL and I wish to do my Master Degree at NUL.
Nothing to show