Universidad de La Laguna vs Kastamonu University vs Keep Coding vs Karatina University - Karu vs Southeast University

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Karatina University - Karu (4.30)
Universidad de La Laguna: wins 0/6 categories
Kastamonu University: wins 0/6 categories
Keep Coding: wins 0/6 categories
Karatina University - Karu: wins 6/6 categories
Southeast University: wins 0/6 categories
Supershine University: wins 0/6 categories
Semarang State University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
16 reviews
×
Best programme: Food Science and Technology
Kastamonu, Turkey
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Public Relations and Advertising
Madrid, Spain
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Dhaka, Bangladesh
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Semarang, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
2.96
3.00
Not rated
4.07
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.45
3.00
Not rated
4.07
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.40
4.00
Not rated
4.47
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.19
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.70
3.50
Not rated
4.21
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.70
3.50
Not rated
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.06
3.50
Not rated
4.21
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate and impactful instructors
  • +Favorable learning experiences and positive personal growth
  • +High-quality facilities and resources, including a great library
  • +Expert professors and opportunities for self-improvement.
  • +Improving campus facilities and study spaces.
  • +International student community and Erasmus opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive community and friendly staff
  • +Engaging learning environment and dedicated professors
  • +Good facilities and affordable living
  • +Affordable tuition fees
  • +Friendly and innovative faculty
  • +Good facilities like labs and library

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor organization and outdated facilities.
  • -Substandard teaching staff and curriculum.
  • -Inefficient and uninspiring learning experiences.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts their learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff cause frustration.
  • -Limited course offerings and inflexible scheduling create barriers to learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency frustrates students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Reviewing the university's performance across various aspects, student life and value emerge as the strongest areas, both scoring 3.7. Location and professors also received favorable marks at 3.45 and 3.4 respectively. On the other hand, facilities present the weakest area with a rating of 2.9625, followed closely by accommodation at 3.0625. Internationality and accommodation fall in the mid-range, indicating moderate satisfaction in these categories.

This university presents a solid, well-rounded profile. Its strongest areas are its professors and internationality, both receiving high marks. Conversely, facilities and location are its weakest points, scoring at a satisfactory but less impressive level. Student life, accommodation, and overall value fall comfortably in the middle, indicating a generally positive experience.

Nothing to show

This institution garners particularly high marks for its professors, reflecting a strong academic core. Student life and accommodation also receive positive feedback, indicating a supportive campus environment. While facilities and location are rated well, these areas represent the university's relative weakest points in the current assessment. Overall, the university demonstrates a commendable balance of strengths.

This university demonstrates robust strengths in key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and value all receiving strong ratings of 4 out of 5. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are rated moderately well at 3, indicating areas for potential development while still offering a generally positive experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 30% of reviews highlight qualified staff, good learning experiences, and job prospects. However, some mention poor facilities, disorganization, and outdated programs, with negative feedback from approximately 19% of reviewers.

With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 67% of reviews are positive. Students praise expert professors and campus improvements, though some note the university's small structure. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

With ~87% positive feedback from 15 reviews, students highlight supportive staff, a conducive learning environment, and vibrant campus life. There is minimal negative feedback.

With a 4/5 average rating from 1 review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). The single review highlights Southeast University as an affordable option among expensive alternatives, with friendly faculty and good facilities like labs and a library.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
6%
33%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
4★
19%
33%
0%
47%
100%
0%
0%
3★
56%
33%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
2★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Food Science and Technology always in demand worldwide

My experience studying at the University of La Laguna (Tenerife-Canary Islands, Spain) was very positive. I started studying a Diploma in Advanced Studies (Pre-Doctorate) in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, after my foreign Degree in Food Engineering was considered comparable in Spain to a Bachelor's Degree in Food Science and Technology (ULL). This area of ​​knowledge has allowed me to gain work experience, worldwide. I am currently in Canada, where this academic degree was also recognized as equivalent to a Bachelor in Science (Food) by the Province of Alberta (IQAS).

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close