TUM School of Management vs Aarhus Business School - Aarhus BSS vs Maseno University vs The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP vs Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK
Side-by-side comparison from 103 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practice-oriented courses and strong industry collaboration
- +Supportive and motivating instructors
- +Small class sizes and personalized attention
- +Approachable and helpful professors
- +Practical, applicable course structure
- +Vibrant student life
- +Strong academic environment and practical learning focus
- +Supportive atmosphere with approachable, passionate instructors
- +Well-structured programmes with engaging teaching methods
- +Practical, hands-on learning and career-oriented education
- +Dedicated lecturers and supportive learning environment
- +Development of essential soft skills and overall personal growth
Nothing to show
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Holistic learning and diverse activities
- +Quality education and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- -Ineffective and outdated course content and teaching methods are a major concern.
- -Poorly managed administrative processes and lack of support are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Limited communication and transparency from the institution.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading policies.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative support.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are common complaints.
Nothing to show
This university receives particularly strong ratings in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **professors**, **location**, **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all scoring a solid 4.33. The lowest-rated area is **accommodation**, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this specific category.
This institution receives exceptional ratings for its **Facilities**, scoring a high 4.75. **Student Life** and **Value** are also strong points, both earning a respectable 4. While **Accomodation** and **Location** are decent, the university's **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, receiving the lowest score of 2.75. **Professors** are rated moderately well.
Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in the value of education, with a rating of 4.53. Professors also receive high marks at 4.49, alongside a positive student life experience at 4.21. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation and internationality, both scoring just under 4.0. Facilities and location also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.
This institution garners consistently high marks, with its **location** and **internationality** standing out as its strongest attributes at 4.5. Its **value for money** also received a top score of 4.5. Other aspects, including **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, are all rated a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience across the board.
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location** (4.5) and **Value** (4.375), alongside an impressive score for **Professors** (4.25). **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also received favorable marks. The **Internationality** aspect, however, registers as the lowest rated area at 3.625, with **Facilities** also performing slightly below average at 3.875.
Nothing to show
With a 4.33/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight high-quality, practice-oriented courses, strong industry collaboration, and dedicated instructors. Some note large student numbers and limited staff as minor drawbacks.
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights professors' willingness to help and well-structured courses. Student life is also noted as amazing. No negative reviews were recorded.
With ~93% of 86 reviews being positive, students praise the university's supportive atmosphere, practical learning, and well-structured programs. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, these 2 reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight excellent communication, teamwork, dedication, love for education, and the quality of courses and lecturers. Practical learning and supportive lecturers preparing students for real-world situations are also praised.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviewers are positive. Students commend dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a holistic learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
First of all, the university is nowhere near as international as it portrays itself to be; there are less international students than you would expect. In terms of the teachers, I can honestly say I had one good teacher per semester. The others ranged from bad to completely unprofessional. Also with the planning of exams and classes, it sometimes made me wonder how the people behind this can be a part of the management department. However, on the bright side, I did like the idea of working in study groups and having to do all sorts of projects - that helps with the practical aspects of teaching. Another thing that I'd praise is the cafeteria, as they offer fresh and diverse food.
I enjoyed learning at the university. The lectures were nice and students were nice to everyone, I found it easier to interact with everyone at school. However, life was tough in general due to lack of enough funds to support my student upkeep. But I recommend the school to anyone
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
