Yalova University - YAU vs University of Brawijaya - UB vs Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM vs Ecole cantonale d'art de Lausanne - ECAL vs State University of Malang - UM

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its Facilities and Internationality, both receiving perfect scores. The Value proposition also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, Accomodation is identified as a significant area for improvement, scoring the lowest. Professors, Student Life, and Location all fall within a solid mid-to-high range.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple facets. Its location is particularly well-regarded, alongside a vibrant student life and good value for money. Accommodation and internationality also receive favorable scores. While professors are highly rated, facilities represent the lowest, though still solid, area of assessment.

Across numerous aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all achieved perfect scores, indicating exceptional experiences in these areas. Facilities and accommodation, while still strong, represent the comparatively weaker aspects with a rating of four.

This institution receives excellent marks, particularly for its **internationality**, scoring a perfect 5. Strong showings are also evident in its **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation**, all earning a solid 4. The **location** and **student life**, however, are rated a more moderate 3. Overall, this represents a well-rounded university with standout global appeal.

This institution receives very strong marks in several key areas, notably Professors and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life also garners significant praise at 4.6. Location stands out as a perfect 5. Facilities and Accomodation are rated well, around 4.17 and 4.33 respectively. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.83.

Outstanding scores define this institution across every evaluated aspect. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a remarkably well-rounded and highly satisfactory university experience with no discernible weak points.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students appreciate the updated systems and challenging, modern teaching methods.

With a 4.72 average rating, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% of feedback). Students highlight inspiring learning spaces, supportive academic environments, and vibrant student life as key strengths.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The single positive comment found the RTHI class helpful for thesis and journal preparation but noted system intricacies regarding supervisor revisions.

The sole review is positive, giving a 4/5 rating. This feedback highlights the school's professional programs across multiple design and art fields, noting diverse and intense classes that allow for specialization.

~83% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and a nurturing learning environment. Some students also highlight affordable living costs and a green, well-maintained campus. A small portion (~17%) of negative feedback points to inadequate facilities, including poor-quality toilets and a lack of parking.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It praises the international standard curriculum and unique integration of Islamic perspectives in courses.