Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University vs University of Brawijaya - UB vs Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM vs State University of Malang - UM vs University of Technology Jamaica - UTECH
Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong technical sciences focus
- +prestigious history and reputation
- +international opportunities and cooperation
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable lecturers
- +Comfortable, well-equipped, and inspiring learning environments
- +Vibrant student life and opportunities for growth
- +Rigorous thesis and journal preparation is highly valued.
- +Effective supervisor guidance during the RTHI class is appreciated.
- +Some system complexities exist, causing repeated revisions.
- +Supportive and inspiring faculty
- +Affordable cost of living and study
- +Positive and student-friendly city environment
- +Practical, hands-on teaching and theoretical foundations
- +Dedicated and supportive faculty
- +Diverse student body and extracurricular activities
- +International curriculum with unique Islamic integration
- +Different academic system compared to other universities
- +N/A (No positive reviews provided)
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and learning experiences frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Inadequate administrative support and unclear management.
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources for learning.
- -Lack of practical application and career preparation.
- -Inadequate and poorly maintained facilities, especially restrooms.
- -Insufficient parking availability.
- -Inefficient administrative processes.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engaging course content are common complaints.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Lack of resources & support
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Course content and teaching methods lack engagement and relevance.
This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Professors** also receive a high rating of 4.33. Areas for potential improvement include **Internationality** and **Value**, which are rated at 3.67. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated at a solid 4.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple facets. Its location is particularly well-regarded, alongside a vibrant student life and good value for money. Accommodation and internationality also receive favorable scores. While professors are highly rated, facilities represent the lowest, though still solid, area of assessment.
Across numerous aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all achieved perfect scores, indicating exceptional experiences in these areas. Facilities and accommodation, while still strong, represent the comparatively weaker aspects with a rating of four.
This institution receives very strong marks in several key areas, notably Professors and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life also garners significant praise at 4.6. Location stands out as a perfect 5. Facilities and Accomodation are rated well, around 4.17 and 4.33 respectively. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.83.
This institution excels in several key areas, with the highest marks awarded for **Value** (4.25) and **Internationality** (4), closely followed by **Location** and **Student Life** (both 3.9). Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.08, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like Facilities and Professors fall within a solid mid-range.
Outstanding scores define this institution across every evaluated aspect. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a remarkably well-rounded and highly satisfactory university experience with no discernible weak points.
With an exceptional score in **location** (5), the university truly shines in this aspect. However, a low rating for **internationality** (1) suggests a significant area for improvement. Other categories, including facilities, student life, accommodation, and value, received moderate ratings of 3, while professors were rated a solid 4.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 and ~0% negative feedback, university reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students praise the institution as a great place for technical sciences development and mention opportunities for cultural exchange and study abroad.
With a 4.72 average rating, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% of feedback). Students highlight inspiring learning spaces, supportive academic environments, and vibrant student life as key strengths.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The single positive comment found the RTHI class helpful for thesis and journal preparation but noted system intricacies regarding supervisor revisions.
~83% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and a nurturing learning environment. Some students also highlight affordable living costs and a green, well-maintained campus. A small portion (~17%) of negative feedback points to inadequate facilities, including poor-quality toilets and a lack of parking.
With a 4.33/5 average rating, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students highlight practical, hands-on teaching, strong theoretical foundations, and preparation for the workforce. No negative feedback was provided.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It praises the international standard curriculum and unique integration of Islamic perspectives in courses.
The single review is positive, rating the university 4/5. This indicates a ~100% positive sentiment.
SPBLETI is a good university with great facility and environment, but not so great program and curriculum for English studies. if you aspire to go to this university, be sure to make a research about the department and the course curriculum, they are improving in the English program and would be better as the year goes by.
Life at Universitas Brawijaya is quite dynamic and diverse. Students have the opportunity to get involved in various extracurricular activities, such as student organizations, clubs, and campus events. These activities provide additional experiences that are useful and enrich campus life. Universitas Brawijaya offers various facilities that support academic and non-academic activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show