London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Hertfordshire - UH vs University of York vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Sheffield Hallam University
Side-by-side comparison from 637 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Supportive tutors and helpful resources
- +Engaging course content with practical application
- +Strong sense of community and social life
- +Supportive and engaging teaching from knowledgeable instructors
- +Welcoming community and vibrant campus life
- +Engaging and well-structured academic programmes
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive and friendly environment
- +Welcoming culture and sense of belonging
- +Varied curriculum and accommodating staff
- +Insightful, well-structured academic work
- +Balanced theory and critical thinking
- +Clear understanding and coherent arguments
- +Strong academic programs with practical application
- +Vibrant social life and positive campus atmosphere
- +Exposure to diverse international cultures
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Delayed result publication and unhelpful professors are major concerns.
- -The facilities are outdated and need modernization.
- -Poor organization and management issues
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful staff
- -Subpar course quality and delivery
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -University disruptions and limited teaching time were major disappointments.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a common complaint.
- -Lack of diversity across the wider university
- -Insufficient student support services
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
With outstanding scores in **Internationality** (4.67), this institution also boasts strong performances in **Facilities** (4.47) and **Professors** (4.47). **Value** (4.45) is also highly rated. The **Accommodation** (4.06) is the lowest scoring area, though still a respectable figure, with **Location** (4.14) and **Student Life** (4.17) also performing moderately well.
This institution receives excellent marks, with **Location** standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.46. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are also strong contributors, both scoring above 4.3. The **weakest areas** are **Accomodation**, **Value**, and **Internationality**, which all hover around the 4.0 mark, indicating room for improvement in these specific domains.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution garners a robust overall rating, with its **location** standing out as a particular strength at 4.38. Students also commend **facilities** (4.18), **professors** (4.14), and **student life** (4.12). Areas showing room for improvement include **accommodation** (3.87), **internationality** (3.88), and the **value** proposition (3.80), which received the lowest scores among the evaluated aspects.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, earning high marks in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. These areas indicate a robust and supportive environment for students. Conversely, its Location and Accommodation received moderate ratings, suggesting these aspects may be areas for potential improvement compared to other evaluated components.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its **location** and **facilities**, both scoring above 4.4. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. Conversely, **accommodation** and **value** are the areas with the lowest scores, both falling just under 4. While professors receive a respectable rating, these two aspects represent the primary opportunities for improvement.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With a 4.42 average rating from 98 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong course content, practical application, community, and social life. A small ~2% of reviews mentioned issues with delayed results and professor engagement.
The University of York receives largely positive feedback (~97%) from ~68 reviews, with an average rating of 4.28/5. Students praise engaging courses, knowledgeable instructors, and welcoming campus life. A small percentage of negative reviews cite disorganization and poor staff responsiveness.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With an average rating of 4.06/5 from 83 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive, highlighting a supportive, friendly, and welcoming environment with caring staff. A single negative review (~1.2%) was received.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars. This feedback is positive, highlighting a well-structured and insightful perspective.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 58 reviews, ~94% of students provide positive feedback, highlighting rewarding academics and a positive social experience. A small percentage (~1.7%) noted areas for improvement.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I can boldly say that today my research skills have improved drastically because of the skills I learnt in UH. UH not only gives you an opportunity to grow, it gives you the necessary exposure as a student. With the experience garnered from UH, you can compete anywhere in the world. The tutors are exceptionally qualified and always ready to guide you through. Adaora Nwaka LLM,Energy Law and the Environment.
York Law School offers a very unique course which contrasts that to every in the country. The experience I have gathered from having interviews and negotiations as an active part of my course is particularly notable. Moreover, the study space is new and well-furnished. It is comfortable and perfect for get togethers with other students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
