London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Hertfordshire - UH vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Newcastle University vs Liverpool Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 591 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive lecturers and staff
- +Opportunities for practical application and skill development
- +Positive campus life and community engagement
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Excellent academic programs and supportive professors
- +Strong career services and practical skill development
- +Vibrant campus life and opportunities for social connection
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
- +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
- +Improved trading profitability and understanding
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Delayed result publication.
- -Unengaging and unapproachable professors.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Lack of adequate academic and personal support, especially at the postgraduate level.
- -Perceived value for money is low due to high tuition fees compared to the quality of education and resources.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Outstanding scores in Internationality (4.66) and Professors (4.47) highlight this university's strengths. Facilities (4.45) and Value (4.42) also received commendable marks. Conversely, Location (4.15) and Student Life (4.14) are areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, ratings. Accomodation (4.07) also falls on the lower end of the spectrum but remains a solid score.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This institution receives exceptional marks for its **Location**, scoring a remarkable 4.75. Student life also ranks highly at 4.67. Areas receiving strong, though slightly lower, scores include facilities (4.52), accommodation (4.22), and internationality (4.29). Professors (4.19) and Value (4.11) are rated competently, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
With a 4.42 average rating from 105 reviews, ~97% are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers and a good learning environment with opportunities for involvement. A small ~2% of reviews mention issues like delayed results and unsupportive professors.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
With an average rating of 4.36/5 from 136 reviews, ~91% of students are highly satisfied. Positive feedback highlights excellent societies, facilities, and careers support. A small ~1.5% of reviews express disappointment with master's level academic support.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I can boldly say that today my research skills have improved drastically because of the skills I learnt in UH. UH not only gives you an opportunity to grow, it gives you the necessary exposure as a student. With the experience garnered from UH, you can compete anywhere in the world. The tutors are exceptionally qualified and always ready to guide you through. Adaora Nwaka LLM,Energy Law and the Environment.
Nothing to show
The facilities of the school of computing are great - very modern building, newest equipment, campus located in the city centre (most likely you don’t need to commute there by metro or a bus). One major thing however that is lacking is the organisation. Being a third-year student I still have the same feeling - the program is written very chaotically. In 2019 there was that revolution of the programme (to keep learning the newest technology) to which lectures and demonstrators still feel a bit unadapted. I hope this will get better in the next year or two years. However, after that time, the taught technology may change again (which is good) and it will take another couple of years for the lecturers to be fluent in what they teaching (which is not good).
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
