Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań - UAM vs Poznan University of Technology - PUT vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs Poznan University of Medical Sciences - PUMS vs Collegium Da Vinci
Side-by-side comparison from 150 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +World-class professors and engaging teaching.
- +Beautiful and supportive campus environment.
- +Vibrant and diverse student community.
- +Practical, industry-connected programs and research opportunities
- +Modern facilities and helpful staff support
- +English-taught courses and international environment
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Positive learning environment and resources
- +Practical training and hospital exposure
- +Supportive and clear teaching methods
- +International community and global career opportunities
- +Practical, project-based learning and real-world competencies.
- +Personalized academic and professional growth support.
- +Inspiring, creative, and inclusive community atmosphere.
- +Approachable and knowledgeable professors
- +Supportive administration and easy-to-use systems
- +Practical, job-market-focused curriculum
Nothing to show
- -Lack of practical application and outdated course content are major disappointments.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues detract from the learning experience.
- -Program coordination and faculty engagement often fall short of expectations.
- -Disorganized and unclear communication from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
- -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
- -Administrative and organizational issues cause student stress.
- -Disorganized administrative processes and unhelpful staff are frustrating.
- -Outdated technology and limited resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and inconsistent policies cause confusion.
- -Minimal learning and effort required for passing.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates impressive strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Professors** also score highly, indicating a positive learning environment. While **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are well-regarded, **Internationality** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting an area for potential development. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with a few particularly strong points and one area that trails slightly.
This institution garners strong acclaim for its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both scoring above 4.4. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded, each achieving a solid 4. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest score, receiving a rating of 3.82. **Value** and **Location** fall in between, with scores of 3.94 and 4.18 respectively.
This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality**, which stands out as its strongest area. Location also receives a high rating, indicating positive aspects in these regards. Areas for potential improvement, based on the provided data, include Facilities, Professors, and Value, all receiving the lowest scores. Student Life and Accomodation are rated moderately well.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, notably in **Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation**, all receiving an impressive average of 4.67. **Facilities** and **Internationality** are rated solidly at 4, while **Value** sits at a respectable 4.33. The weakest rated category is **Facilities**.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with its **Facilities** standing out as a particular strength, receiving a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Professors** also score highly. Conversely, **Accommodation** represents the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement in this area. Student life, internationality, and value for money are all rated solidly.
Nothing to show
~96% of reviews are positive, highlighting great professors, a beautiful campus, and vibrant student life. A small percentage of feedback noted disappointment with practical exercises and some program coordination.
With a ~84% positive rating from 19 reviews, students highlight respected technical programs, modern facilities, and strong industry connections. Opportunities for research and international programs are frequently praised.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.
Approximately 89% of reviews are positive, praising development opportunities, practical training, and supportive staff. About 11% of feedback mentions organizational issues like overlapping classes and exams.
All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Reviews highlight practical, individualized education, project-based learning, and real-world competency development. Lecturers with business experience provide valuable hands-on insights.
Most reviews praise helpful, knowledgeable teachers and a positive atmosphere. Students appreciate practical learning and an international environment. A small portion of feedback suggests the academic bar is low.
Nothing to show
In my opinion, Adam Mickiewicz University is a very solid institution, especially if you are interested in humanities, social sciences, or academic research. It has a good reputation, strong research facilities, and international connections, which provide significant opportunities for academic development. As for the drawbacks — the biggest challenges may be bureaucracy and administrative procedures, as well as the cost of accommodation, especially for international students. Therefore, it is worth carefully analyzing the faculties, the programme, and the housing options before starting your studies.
Nothing to show
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
Honestly, my love for medicine is what keeps me here. Going to a school in a different country you have to adapt to different customs and ways of doing things which is very different to how things are run in my home country. My issue with this school is the organisation, sometimes classes overlap, sometimes exams overlap with classes and students have to sort this out themselves, which should not be happening. Timetabling and exams shouldn't be the students' responsibility medicine are stressful as it is. As I said this is how things are run in this country.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
