Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Escuela Europea de Negocios vs Universidade da Coruña - UDC vs Universidad Europea - UE vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP

Side-by-side comparison from 168 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Europea de Negocios (5.00)
Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO: wins 0/5 categories
Escuela Europea de Negocios: wins 3/5 categories
Universidade da Coruña - UDC: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Europea - UE: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP: wins 0/5 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/5 categories
Mestre Mateo School of Art and Design - EASD: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Business Administration
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: Art and Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.14
4.00
3.44
4.33
3.83
3.92
5.00
Win
Location
4.00
4.00
3.57
4.00
3.79
4.93
Win
4.00
Professors
4.14
5.00
Win
3.82
4.29
3.90
4.64
3.00
Internationality
4.00
5.00
3.27
4.60
3.44
4.93
5.00
Student life
4.00
5.00
Win
3.39
4.11
3.76
4.15
3.00
Value
4.00
5.00
Win
3.38
3.78
3.65
4.29
4.00
Accommodation
4.50
5.00
3.04
3.87
3.44
3.62
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent organization and clear, accessible courses.
  • +Supportive staff and personalized academic attention.
  • +Modern facilities and diverse international opportunities.
  • +Renowned university status and societal impact
  • +Welcoming and fulfilling study abroad experience
  • +Excellent teaching structure
  • +Broad international perspective and exchange opportunities
  • +Strong emphasis on practical learning and professional development
  • +Involved and approachable faculty who care about education
  • +Modern teaching and attractive campus
  • +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
  • +Welcoming people and active campus life
  • +Comprehensive and complementary programmes
  • +Practical learning opportunities and real-world application
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
  • +Small class sizes and quality teaching
  • +Strong design and artistic programs
  • +European exchange opportunities
Cons
  • -Poor leadership and unprofessional management are prevalent.
  • -Ineffective teaching quality due to unqualified instructors is a significant problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization, are frequently criticized.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common source of frustration.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Excessive administrative and management issues create frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder learning experiences.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
  • -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
  • -High costs for course materials.
  • -Poor professor English proficiency and lack of care for international students.
  • -Disorganization and a lack of a cohesive program structure.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning and student support.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective study.
  • -Lack of clear communication and feedback creates frustration.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners excellent scores across most aspects. Accommodations stand out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and Professors are also rated highly at 4.14. Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all received a solid score of 4. This indicates a well-rounded institution with particular strengths in student living arrangements and academic personnel.

Receiving outstanding marks, this institution excels particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Location also stand out with a strong 4. The university's weakest, though still highly positive, area lies in its Facilities and Location, which, while good, did not reach the perfect score achieved in other key aspects.

Offering a diverse range of experiences, this institution shows its strongest performance in the **Professors** category, receiving a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value also received moderately positive feedback, suggesting room for improvement in certain key student support areas.

Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.

This university garners strong marks in academics and overall experience, with Professors receiving the highest rating at approximately 3.9 and Facilities closely following at 3.83. Student Life and Location also score well. Areas for potential improvement lie in Accomodation and Internationality, both rated at 3.44, indicating these aspects may not meet the same high standards as other surveyed categories.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

Excelling in several key areas, this institution receives top marks for its facilities, accommodation, and internationality. Conversely, areas for improvement include professors and student life, both scoring moderately. The location and overall value are also rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded academic environment with specific strengths in physical resources and global engagement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent academic environments, helpful staff, and good organization. One reviewer mentioned unprofessional director and unqualified staff.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlighted their rewarding acceptance, a welcoming atmosphere, and excellent teaching structure.

With 64 reviews and a 3.84 average rating, ~81% of feedback is positive. Students highly value the international experience, strong academic learning, and professional development opportunities. Some note that teaching methods and practical experience could be improved.

Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.

With ~74% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.94/5, students highlight positive interactions and campus life. A small percentage (~6%) express disappointment, citing low academic rigor and English proficiency concerns.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

With a 4/5 average rating from 1 review, ~100% of feedback is positive. The single positive review highlights strong design programs, small class sizes, good teaching quality, and a charming city location. There is no negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
75%
100%
3%
36%
29%
71%
0%
4★
0%
0%
78%
62%
46%
21%
100%
3★
13%
0%
19%
18%
20%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
2%
3%
7%
0%
1★
13%
0%
0%
2%
3%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The teachers has created a special conexion.

The university was so good, I think that it would be your best time in your life. Yo meet new friends who will be forever and, mostly, you learn a lot about important things such how to be a good professional.

University Review

Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close