Escuela de Arte José Nogué - EAJN vs Institut de Langues et de Commerce International - ILCI vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs ESTACA Engineering School vs Daystar University
Side-by-side comparison from 54 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Hands-on learning and innovative projects
- +Approachable and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong industry connections and career opportunities
- +Student-centered approach and preparedness for disruptions
- +Engaging and practical academic programs with knowledgeable lecturers
- +Welcoming and supportive learning environment for personal growth
- +Dedicated and supportive lecturers
- +Conducive learning environment and facilities
- +Academic knowledge and practical skill development
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
- -Limited career support and unclear program outcomes are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student progress.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Communication gaps and lack of support create frustration.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution receives strong marks for its **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring a perfect 5 and a high 4.5 respectively. The **Internationality** also stands out with a 4.5 rating. Areas that could see improvement include **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, each receiving a 3.5, suggesting these aspects are adequate but not exceptional. **Professors** are rated well at 4, indicating a positive academic experience.
This institution receives high marks across most surveyed areas, with "Value" being the strongest at 4.51. "Facilities" also score exceptionally well at 4.46. "Internationality" and "Professors" are also rated favorably. The weakest area identified is "Accomodation," receiving a score of 3.9. "Student Life" and "Location" fall within a similarly mid-range, solid performance.
This institution demonstrates a strong showing across multiple aspects. Its **value** stands out with an exceptional rating, alongside high marks for **professors** and **accommodation**. On the other hand, **student life** and **internationality** received the lowest scores, though still respectable. Facilities and location also fall within a solid mid-range performance.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are highly positive (~100%). Students praise hands-on learning, innovative projects, and knowledgeable professors. Opportunities in specialized sectors like automotive are also highlighted.
With an average rating of 4.46/5, ~97.6% of reviews are positive. Students praise student-centered approaches, prepared remote learning, engaging academics, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned institutional influences.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise the conducive learning environment, dedicated lecturers, and valuable academic/practical experiences. A small amount of feedback (~17%) suggests a need for improved equipment and more qualified teachers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I'm thrilled to share my experience at ESTACA Engineering School, where I've grown both academically and personally. The school's strong focus on hands-on learning and innovative projects has equipped me with the skills and confidence to excel in my field. The professors are approachable, knowledgeable, and passionate about teaching, making complex concepts accessible and engaging. The campus life is vibrant, with numerous extracurricular activities and clubs that foster a sense of community and teamwork. What stood out to me was the school's emphasis on real-world applications and industry partnerships, which have provided me with valuable internship opportunities and a network of professionals in my field. If you're looking for a well-rounded education that prepares you for the challenges of the engineering world, ESTACA is an excellent choice. I'm grateful for the experience and proud to be a part of the ESTACA community.
Daystar University gtaught me the importance of expressing myself and respectfully disagreeing with opinions that i djid not subscribe to. The university taught me that as much as i am leader i should not be afraid to be hands on on any given task in life and work space. A servant leader leads by example and does not instill fear to those he is leading.
The learning environment is conducive. good accommodation for students especially the female hostels, almost 24/7 electricity. secure environment. When it comes to academic performance I'd say they are average, The lecturers are sometimes not motivated to teach because of delay in their salaries but overall the university is good but could be better with better government,
Nothing to show
