London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs University of Cumbria vs London Academy of Trading - LAT vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 364 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Northeastern University London, New College Of The Humanities (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 1/4 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/4 categories
University of Cumbria: wins 0/4 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 0/4 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/4 categories
Fashion Retail Academy: wins 0/4 categories
Northeastern University London, New College Of The Humanities: wins 3/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Lancaster, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
London, The United Kingdom
3.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Creative Marketing and Communications
Best programme: Bachelor of Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.44
2.75
Not rated
4.40
4.33
5.00
Win
Location
4.78
4.74
4.00
Not rated
4.70
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.26
4.75
4.75
Not rated
4.60
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.60
3.75
Not rated
4.60
4.00
4.00
Student life
3.64
4.56
3.25
Not rated
3.90
2.67
5.00
Win
Value
4.04
4.50
4.50
Not rated
3.90
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.79
4.32
4.00
Not rated
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
  • +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
  • +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical, career-focused programs and employability emphasis
  • +Supportive and motivating teaching staff
  • +Enjoyable study environment and facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Engaging and supportive tutors
  • +Feeling respected and treated as an adult
  • +Abundant opportunities for involvement and engagement.
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
  • -Lack of structure and significant workload.
  • -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are significant concerns.
  • -Administrative issues and lack of support create frustration.
  • -Inflexible policies and limited course options are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff, are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered, leading to disengagement.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

With a standout score for professors, this institution clearly excels in academic instruction. Conversely, facilities present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like location and accommodation are well-regarded, suggesting a generally positive student experience, though student life scores are moderate. Internationality and value also receive favorable marks.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

The university excels in its **Location**, receiving a perfect score. **Facilities** are also a significant strength, rated highly. Conversely, **Student Life** is the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating. **Accomodation** and **Value** fall in the middle, while **Professors** and **Internationality** are rated positively. This provides a mixed but generally favorable overview.

This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas. It excels in its **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all receiving perfect marks. **Professors** and **Internationality** are also strong, earning a solid 4 out of 5. The university's **Value** is also rated a respectable 4, indicating good return on investment. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, particularly in its campus environment and amenities.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

Most reviews are highly positive, rating the university 4.5/5. Students praise practical, career-focused programs, supportive staff, and appealing campuses. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

With only 3 reviews, feedback indicates a generally positive experience (~67% positive). One review highlighted tutors as a key positive aspect, praising their support and interactive teaching. No negative feedback was received.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. The sole reviewer highlighted abundant opportunities, including study abroad and co-op programs, and engaging communities. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
75%
75%
0%
60%
0%
100%
4★
44%
25%
0%
0%
40%
33%
0%
3★
18%
0%
25%
0%
0%
67%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close