Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad Nacional de Córdoba - UNC vs Universidad Católica de Córdoba - UCC vs Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University - ULSPU vs EduWW Business Academy

Side-by-side comparison from 68 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National University of Villa Maria - UNVM (5.00)
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba - UNC: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Córdoba - UCC: wins 0/7 categories
Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University - ULSPU: wins 0/7 categories
EduWW Business Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Crawford University: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Villa Maria - UNVM: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Administration and Social Policy
Best programme: Administration
Miami, Florida, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Political Science
Category ratings
Facilities
3.36
4.18
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.09
Win
3.83
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
3.43
4.00
Professors
3.91
4.34
4.86
Not rated
Not rated
4.29
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.82
4.03
Win
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
3.57
4.00
Student life
3.56
3.80
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
3.57
5.00
Win
Value
3.73
4.57
4.14
Not rated
Not rated
4.29
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.27
4.18
Win
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
3.71
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong engineering programs and good job prospects
  • +Committed and experienced teaching staff
  • +High-quality education providing a solid foundation
  • +Free, state-funded education with high academic standards
  • +Dynamic learning environments and development of essential skills
  • +Excellent infrastructure and versatile course offerings
  • +Inspiring, passionate professors and engaging teacher-student interaction
  • +Valuable networking opportunities with recognized professionals and enriching events
  • +Supportive campus environment and a strong sense of community
  • +High-quality education and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong student support and career assistance
  • +Active campus life and creative opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, educative, and engaging academic programs
  • +Access to educational resources and intellectual staff
  • +Supportive and serene university environment
  • +Free tuition and accessibility
  • +Academic excellence and facilities
Cons
  • -Poor management and administrative support
  • -Outdated curriculum and excessive program length
  • -Unattractive facilities
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of practical skills development.
  • -Poor career guidance and limited industry connections.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and lack of responsiveness from staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support is a common problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities & equipment
  • -Inconsistent and uninspiring teaching quality

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a frequent complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues often cause student frustration.
  • -Lack of adequate resources, such as technology and supplies, is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent and unengaging teaching methods are a major disappointment.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution performs exceptionally well in location, boasting a rating of 4.09. Professors are also highly regarded at 3.91, and value for money receives a solid 3.73. Student life and facilities are rated moderately. However, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.82, followed closely by accommodation at 3.27.

Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with its **Value** standing out as the strongest area, achieving the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also score well, indicating satisfaction in these aspects. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** received the lowest scores, suggesting these are areas with the most room for improvement. Professors are rated highly, and internationality is also a moderate strength.

Academic and student life aspects at this institution are generally well-regarded. Professors receive particularly high marks, indicating a strength in teaching quality. The university also scores well for its facilities, accommodation, and student life. Location, however, represents a comparatively weaker area, alongside its internationality. The value proposition is also positively assessed.

A consistent rating of zero across all surveyed categories presents a peculiar academic profile. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or identifiable weaknesses to highlight. The university performs uniformly poorly in every aspect, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, according to the provided metrics.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring an impressive 4.29. Facilities also receive a solid rating of 4. Conversely, the **Location** is the lowest-rated aspect at 3.43, with Student Life and Internationality closely following at 3.57. Accommodations land in the middle at 3.71.

This institution garners excellent marks, with perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and student life, alongside a strong value proposition. Accommodation and internationality also receive positive assessments. Location, while still rated well, stands out as the comparatively weakest aspect among its strong offerings.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.69, ~62% of reviews are positive, praising good education and experienced professors. Around 15% are negative, citing outdated curricula and poor program management.

With 33 positive reviews out of 35, students praise academic excellence and free education. One negative review cited outdated curriculum and limited practical skills, representing ~3% of feedback.

Nearly all (90%+) student feedback is positive, highlighting excellent networking opportunities, dedicated professors, and supportive classmates. Some mention impressive campus space and valuable curriculum. No negative feedback was recorded.

All four reviews are positive, giving an average of 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the quality of education and professors, while also mentioning good employment support and developed public activities.

Nothing to show

Most reviews are highly positive (~86%), praising practical classes, educational resources, and a serene environment. Limited negative feedback (~0%) did not provide specific recurring themes.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised. Positive feedback highlights its aspirational academic excellence and excellent campus facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
31%
34%
75%
50%
0%
43%
100%
4★
31%
60%
13%
50%
0%
43%
0%
3★
23%
3%
13%
0%
0%
14%
0%
2★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
8%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Very practical classes

Crawford University is one of the best school for tech in general. As a computer science student i can testify that this by far is one of the best, the classes are very practical and even though i do both online and physical classes- the classes are never boring and each session is very educative

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close