Université Grenoble Alpes - UG vs GEM Alpine Business School vs Audencia Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 148 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Relevant, up-to-date programs with practical applications
- +State-of-the-art research facilities and conducive study environment
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty encouraging research
- +Global faculty insights and international student connections.
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with real-world application.
- +Personalized support and rich international opportunities.
- +Excellent teachers and diverse international community
- +Great facilities and well-structured classes
- +Supportive learning environment and city amenities
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Strong marketing & business programs
- +Excellent student support & community
- +Diverse academic pathways & practical experience
- +Strong academic support and faculty availability
- +Practical, real-world business focus and company connections
- +Emphasis on international perspective and personal/professional development
- +Excellent and helpful online classes and lectures
- +Beautiful campus and vibrant student life
- +Strong academic reputation and international recognition
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and campus infrastructure are disappointing.
- -Course content and overall academic offerings are lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum or course structure often fails to meet student expectations.
- -Limited practical training and theory-heavy courses.
- -Unresponsive professors and resistance to feedback.
- -Lack of student interaction and networking opportunities.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor communication.
- -Irrelevant and outdated courses with a lack of student engagement.
- -Significant administrative and organizational issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are major dissatisfactions.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are problematic.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a generally positive university profile. The strongest area is **Professors**, scoring 4.25, suggesting a high quality of instruction. **Facilities** also perform well at 4.1875. The lowest-rated categories are **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, both at 4.03125, indicating potential areas for improvement. Other aspects like Location and Student Life received solid scores around 4.09.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across most areas. Strengths are evident in **Professors (4.14)**, **Student Life (4.13)**, and **Value (4.10)**, indicating satisfaction with teaching quality, campus engagement, and affordability. **Facilities (4.04)** and **Internationality (4.06)** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation (3.81)** and **Location (3.86)** are the areas with the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
This university garners strong marks for its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.385. Professors and Value also score well at 4.125. Areas like Facilities and Student Life are generally positive, hovering around 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.579, indicating it could benefit from improvement compared to other aspects of the university experience.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This institution presents a mixed picture in its evaluations. It shines brightest in **Location**, achieving a score of over 4.1, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.07 and **Professors** at 3.9. Conversely, **Accomodation** is its least favored aspect, with a rating of 3.37. The university also garners solid marks in Internationality and Value.
Across several key areas, this institution garners exceptionally high ratings. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value all received outstanding scores of 4.75. Location and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.5. This indicates a consistently positive experience for students, with its strongest attributes lying in its academic and residential offerings.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accomodation. Facilities and Value also received strong marks. Professors and Internationality were rated well, though they represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still positive, scores compared to the university's standout features.
Most (~97%) students praise the university's research focus, up-to-date programs, and supportive environment. Positive feedback highlights knowledgeable faculty and good facilities, with only minor negative comments on non-academic aspects.
With an average rating of 4.31/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students praise the supportive, innovative, and diverse learning environment, with faculty sharing global insights and courses aligned with tech trends. Some note challenges with group work and admission to certain exchange programs.
Nearly all (95%) of 20 university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, great facilities, and good teachers. A single negative review cited disappointment with practical tool training and professor engagement.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With ~87% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.93/5, students praise good knowledge transfer, specialization options, internship access, and vibrant campus life. A small portion of reviews mention unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise approachable professors and practical, international learning experiences. Some note campus facilities and student life could be improved with more funding.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, positive feedback (~50%) highlights excellent online classes and a great learning environment. Negative feedback is negligible, representing ~0% of the total.
Grenoble Alpes University is a very good university from a scientific point of view. The modern laboratories, equipped with various materials, allow for numerous practical projects. Furthermore, the campus, which brings together all the necessary institutions for a better student life, is a major asset. In addition, the university has many professors who are true professionals in research, and who always remain attentive to support students.
Very good program offering rich training in different sectors of the commerce sector. The establishment has good infrastructure. She offers us good working materials for our projects. The Grenoble campus is not the best in France, but still very good There is a gym, classes, well equipped, amphitheatres, quite large and a beautiful cafeteria, it's not great luxury, but it has everything you need In our program, especially my year, we are lucky to have very good teachers who listen and who train us in an excellent way. This school nevertheless lacks international students compared to the top 5 of École de France, a business
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!
Nothing to show
