IÉSEG School of Management vs Université Grenoble Alpes - UG vs GEM Alpine Business School vs ESSCA School of Management vs IDRAC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 376 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Relevant, up-to-date programs with practical applications
- +State-of-the-art research facilities and conducive study environment
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty encouraging research
- +Global faculty insights and international student connections.
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with real-world application.
- +Personalized support and rich international opportunities.
- +Supportive and approachable teachers and staff.
- +Valuable business knowledge and specialization opportunities.
- +Enjoyable campus life and enriching activities.
- +Strong academic support and faculty availability
- +Practical, real-world business focus and company connections
- +Emphasis on international perspective and personal/professional development
- +Excellent and helpful online classes and lectures
- +Beautiful campus and vibrant student life
- +Strong academic reputation and international recognition
- +Transformative personal and professional growth
- +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
- +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and campus infrastructure are disappointing.
- -Course content and overall academic offerings are lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum or course structure often fails to meet student expectations.
- -Inadequate professors and poor organization
- -Expensive and irrelevant courses
- -Unmotivated student body
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are major dissatisfactions.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a generally positive university profile. The strongest area is **Professors**, scoring 4.25, suggesting a high quality of instruction. **Facilities** also perform well at 4.1875. The lowest-rated categories are **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, both at 4.03125, indicating potential areas for improvement. Other aspects like Location and Student Life received solid scores around 4.09.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across most areas. Strengths are evident in **Professors (4.14)**, **Student Life (4.13)**, and **Value (4.10)**, indicating satisfaction with teaching quality, campus engagement, and affordability. **Facilities (4.04)** and **Internationality (4.06)** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation (3.81)** and **Location (3.86)** are the areas with the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a generally positive academic environment. The university excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.0. Professors also receive strong marks, reflecting a high quality of instruction. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities** and **Value** indicate moderate satisfaction, while **Internationality** scores well, suggesting a diverse community.
Across several key areas, this institution garners exceptionally high ratings. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value all received outstanding scores of 4.75. Location and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.5. This indicates a consistently positive experience for students, with its strongest attributes lying in its academic and residential offerings.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accomodation. Facilities and Value also received strong marks. Professors and Internationality were rated well, though they represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still positive, scores compared to the university's standout features.
Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
Most (~97%) students praise the university's research focus, up-to-date programs, and supportive environment. Positive feedback highlights knowledgeable faculty and good facilities, with only minor negative comments on non-academic aspects.
With an average rating of 4.31/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students praise the supportive, innovative, and diverse learning environment, with faculty sharing global insights and courses aligned with tech trends. Some note challenges with group work and admission to certain exchange programs.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising teachers, learning, and campus life. A small portion of negative feedback (around 6.5%) mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise approachable professors and practical, international learning experiences. Some note campus facilities and student life could be improved with more funding.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, positive feedback (~50%) highlights excellent online classes and a great learning environment. Negative feedback is negligible, representing ~0% of the total.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Grenoble Alpes University is a very good university from a scientific point of view. The modern laboratories, equipped with various materials, allow for numerous practical projects. Furthermore, the campus, which brings together all the necessary institutions for a better student life, is a major asset. In addition, the university has many professors who are true professionals in research, and who always remain attentive to support students.
Very good program offering rich training in different sectors of the commerce sector. The establishment has good infrastructure. She offers us good working materials for our projects. The Grenoble campus is not the best in France, but still very good There is a gym, classes, well equipped, amphitheatres, quite large and a beautiful cafeteria, it's not great luxury, but it has everything you need In our program, especially my year, we are lucky to have very good teachers who listen and who train us in an excellent way. This school nevertheless lacks international students compared to the top 5 of École de France, a business
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
