Stockholm University - SU vs Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro - UTAD vs Notre Dame College vs Faculty of Mechanical Engineering - The Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi vs Applied Science Private University
Side-by-side comparison from 58 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and approachable educators, staff, and administration
- +Engaging and well-structured courses with student freedom
- +Excellent campus life with great facilities and a welcoming environment
- +Welcoming atmosphere and inclusive integration programs
- +Supportive and accessible teaching staff
- +Beautiful and functional campus environment
- +Supportive and dedicated teachers/staff
- +Welcoming and friendly community/atmosphere
- +Academic and personal growth opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Inspiring professors and strong IT/coding foundation
- +Supportive atmosphere and valuable free courses
- +Practical application through labs and hands-on projects
- +High-quality education and state-of-the-art facilities
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Positive and ambitious learning environment
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including ignored requests and lack of conflict resolution.
- -Unresponsive or unsupportive faculty and staff.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized for being uninspired or insufficient.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of necessary resources and equipment hinders learning.
Nothing to show
- -Students express frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Inflexible course structures and limited learning opportunities are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and limited individual attention are prevalent.
Nothing to show
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas, with **Professors** standing out at 4.17 and **Value** close behind at 4.09. Facilities also garnered a high score of 4.08. The lowest rated category is **Location**, scoring 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this aspect compared to other surveyed elements. Overall, student life and internationality also received favorable, albeit slightly lower, ratings.
This institution garners its highest marks for **Location**, achieving a score of 4.35. **Student Life** also scores well at 4.16. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest rating at 3.47. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Accommodation, and Value, fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution garners excellent marks in nearly all assessed aspects, particularly excelling in Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a high 4.75. While still strong, the Facilities and Accommodation areas are the relatively weakest, both rated at 4.25. Professors also received a very favorable rating of 4.5.
Nothing to show
This university excels in several key areas, achieving top marks for its **Facilities** and **Value**, both rated at an impressive 4.75. **Professors** and **Location** also receive strong scores of 4.5. Areas with lower ratings include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which stand at 3.75. **Student Life** is rated a solid 4.25. Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths in its physical resources and academic offerings.
This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities**, achieving a high 4.75, and strong commendations for **Professors** and **Student Life** at 4.5. While **Location** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.75. Overall, the **Value** is rated a solid 4.
Nothing to show
Nearly all reviews praise approachable educators, smooth administration, and excellent campus life with good amenities. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with course structure or administrative support.
With a 4.1/5 average rating from 20 reviews, ~85% are positive. Students praise the welcoming atmosphere and beautiful green campus spaces. Teachers are described as helpful, fostering a positive student-teacher relationship.
All four reviews are highly positive (100%), with students praising the outstanding campus environment and supportive, helpful teachers. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise dedicated professors, a supportive atmosphere, and practical learning opportunities. Some noted fast-paced courses and resource availability could be improved.
All 4 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise high-quality technology, state-of-the-art infrastructure, and cooperative, informative faculty. The learning environment is described as positive and ambitious, with a unique, conceptual study pattern.
Nothing to show
SU is a quite vibrant school and I am quite satisfied so far. I believed my programme can help unlock multiple career prospects in the future, The professors are kind and always willing to provide assistance.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show