Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP vs Universidade Anhembi Morumbi - AM vs Estácio vs International School of Management vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 60 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.70)
Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP: wins 0/7 categories
Universidade Anhembi Morumbi - AM: wins 0/7 categories
Estácio: wins 0/7 categories
International School of Management: wins 4/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Citizen-Centered Digital Health and Social Care
Best programme: Administration
Sao Paulo, Brazil
4.20
Read more reviews
23 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.43
4.05
4.64
4.56
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.25
4.71
4.00
4.64
4.78
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
3.00
4.57
4.27
4.82
Win
4.67
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
2.75
4.00
3.41
4.82
Win
4.67
3.00
Not rated
Student life
3.00
4.29
4.05
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.25
4.14
3.68
4.73
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
2.67
4.00
3.50
4.64
Win
3.22
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and knowledge transfer
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Modern facilities and advanced technology.
  • +Well-structured and relevant programs.
  • +Excellent professors and quality teaching
  • +Flexible class schedules and balance with other responsibilities
  • +Good infrastructure and student benefits/opportunities
  • +Expert professors and quality cohorts
  • +Flexible learning and personalized support
  • +Global exposure and networking opportunities
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Pervasive and overwhelming activism, particularly a strong left bias, stifles unbiased learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support for students is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support for distance learning students are problematic.
  • -The institution's financial focus overshadows student welfare and education.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shows a mixed performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving a high rating of 4.25. In contrast, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest point, with a score of 2.67. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life are moderate at 3, while Internationality also falls below average at 2.75. The overall **Value** is rated a respectable 3.25.

This institution receives high marks across multiple categories. Location is its strongest suit, boasting a near-perfect score. Professors and facilities also stand out with excellent ratings. Student life and value are well-regarded, though slightly lower than other areas. Accommodation and internationality are rated a solid 4, indicating good but less exceptional performance compared to the university's top strengths.

This institution receives strong acclaim for its **Professors**, scoring an impressive 4.27. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded, both earning 4.05. The **Location** is rated at a solid 4.0. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 3.5, and **Internationality** also presents a lower score at 3.41. **Value** falls in the middle at 3.68.

This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews show approximately 74% positive feedback, praising knowledgeable professors and a supportive environment. However, about 16.7% of reviews mention concerns like activism affecting learning.

With ~78% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.22/5, students praise excellent faculty and advanced, modern facilities. Some minor criticisms mention superficial course content and lengthy, repetitive subjects.

~87% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, good infrastructure, and flexible schedules. A small portion of feedback (~13%) mentions concerns about financial focus and inconsistent teaching.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
44%
52%
64%
67%
50%
0%
4★
17%
33%
30%
36%
33%
0%
0%
3★
33%
22%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
17%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Just starting and very happy

I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close