Furman University vs Kean University - KU vs University of Tunis El Manar vs Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University - ATBU, Bauchi vs Federal Polytechnic Bauchi - FPTB

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Federal Polytechnic Bauchi - FPTB (5.00)
Furman University: wins 0/7 categories
Kean University - KU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Tunis El Manar: wins 0/7 categories
Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University - ATBU, Bauchi: wins 1/7 categories
Federal Polytechnic Bauchi - FPTB: wins 6/7 categories
Sa'adu Zungur University - SAZU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Union, New Jersey, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Best programme: Applied Geology
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Chemistry
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.00
2.80
3.93
Win
3.67
3.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
3.20
4.33
4.50
Win
3.00
Professors
Not rated
4.00
3.60
4.44
4.67
Win
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
2.40
3.63
4.33
Win
1.00
Student life
Not rated
4.00
3.60
4.40
5.00
Win
3.00
Value
Not rated
4.00
3.60
4.44
4.67
Win
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
3.00
3.47
4.00
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Abundant student opportunities and support services
  • +Attractive campus environment and decent housing
  • +Excellent professors and academic rigor.
  • +Vibrant student life and extracurricular opportunities.
  • +Strong career prospects and respected degrees.
  • +Friendly and supportive lecturers and positive student-lecturer relationships.
  • +Conducive and serene learning environment with technology focus.
  • +Affordable tuition fees and practical, relevant course delivery.
  • +Excellent quality of education and impactful learning.
  • +Diverse programs and experienced faculty.
  • +Respectful and inclusive environment with friendly professors.
  • +Dedicated, quality education from lecturers
  • +Supportive environment valuing students
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and a disconnect with faculty are frequently cited problems.
  • -Administrative and management incompetence is a significant issue.
  • -Systems and educational structure fail to meet expectations.
  • -Outdated and ineffective materials are a problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a constant problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and administration create frustration.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date with industry demands.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently mentioned.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong ratings for its **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all scoring a commendable 4 out of 5. Facilities and Accomodation are rated adequately at 3, while Internationality also lands at this midpoint. The university's weakest area is its **Location**, receiving a score of 0, which significantly impacts its overall appeal.

A mixed but generally positive performance emerges from these university ratings. The institution excels in areas such as **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving a strong 3.6. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest point, rated at a lower 2.4, while **Facilities** also scored below average at 2.8. Other aspects like **Location** and **Accomodation** fall within the moderate range.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring an impressive 4.44. **Student Life** also receives high marks at 4.4. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.47. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range.

This institution receives high marks across most aspects, notably excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Professors and Value are also strong performers, both rated highly. Accommodation is well-regarded, and Internationality scores are positive. The weakest area appears to be Facilities, which received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

This institution garners strong marks in areas like Professors and Value, both receiving a rating of 4. Conversely, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker aspect, with a score of just 1. Other surveyed categories, including Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, all received a consistent rating of 3, suggesting a mid-range performance in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

This university receives a high rating of 4/5 stars, with all feedback being positive. Students appreciate ample opportunities in research, scholarships, study abroad, and campus employment.

Most reviews are positive (~60%), highlighting vibrant student life, excellent professors, and job-market-aligned programs. One negative review (~20%) criticized management and education structure. The average rating is 3.4/5.

With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 16 reviews, ~88% are positive. Students praise friendly lecturers, conducive learning environments, and relevant practical/theory teachings. No negative reviews were recorded.

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the quality of education, diverse programs, and experienced faculty, with ~100% positive feedback.

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is predominantly positive (~100% favorable). Students highlight dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a supportive environment. Limited negative feedback exists, with one mention of lacking infrastructural amenities.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
20%
56%
100%
0%
4★
0%
100%
40%
31%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
20%
13%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

terrible

I've never seen such incompetence anywhere else. management is terrible system doesn't live up to expectations education in most institutions completely lacks structure cheap material that doesn't work

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close