University of Ghana - UG vs Central University vs Accra Technical University vs University of Development Studies - UDS vs Valley View University - Vvu

Side-by-side comparison from 295 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Valley View University - Vvu (4.60)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 1/7 categories
Central University: wins 1/7 categories
Accra Technical University: wins 1/7 categories
University of Development Studies - UDS: wins 0/7 categories
Valley View University - Vvu: wins 4/7 categories
Accra Business School: wins 0/7 categories
African University College of Communications: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Building Technology
Best programme: Integrated Business and Humanities
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.38
3.67
3.57
4.11
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.32
3.88
3.82
3.71
4.38
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.25
4.00
4.36
Win
4.00
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.08
4.38
Win
3.95
3.71
4.22
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.29
Win
3.88
3.95
3.71
4.22
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.22
3.75
4.41
4.14
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.48
3.38
3.24
4.00
4.22
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +Practical, relevant programmes with industry insights
  • +Approachable, friendly, and dedicated lecturers
  • +Supportive, quiet, and enabling learning environment
  • +Strong focus on practical learning and job market preparation
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers
  • +Encourages leadership and professional growth
  • +Practical, field-based learning in communities
  • +Modern facilities and knowledgeable professors
  • +Moderate fees
  • +Quality teaching and accessible, professional lecturers
  • +Good learning environment with adequate resources and facilities
  • +Supportive community and academic opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are frequently perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Students often express dissatisfaction with the quality of teaching and curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring issue.
  • -The curriculum is often inflexible and irrelevant to current needs.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and a lack of engagement from instructors are highly disappointing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

Overall, this university presents a strong profile. Its highest-rated area is **Internationality** at 4.375, demonstrating a significant global presence. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** emerge as the weakest points, both scoring 3.375. **Location** and **Student Life** are well-regarded, tied at 3.875, while **Value** sits at a solid 3.75.

A review of university ratings reveals a strong performance in value and professor quality, with scores of 4.41 and 4.36 respectively. Student life and internationality also received high marks, both at 3.95. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3.24, followed by facilities at 3.67. The location received a respectable 3.82 rating.

Overall, the university demonstrates a strong performance with notable strengths in Value, Professors, and Accomodation, all scoring an average of 4 or higher. Student Life, Location, and Internationality also received solid ratings, hovering around 3.7. The facilities, while adequate, represent the lowest-scoring area at 3.57, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

Overall, the university demonstrates a strong performance across multiple aspects. Its strongest area is **Value**, receiving a rating of 4.67. **Professors** and **Location** also stand out with high scores of 4.33 and 4.38 respectively. The university's **Facilities** are its weakest area, with a rating of 4.11, though this is still a solid score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are all rated similarly well at 4.22.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

With a 4.1/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~70% of feedback is positive. Students praise a blend of theory and practice in programs, approachable lecturers, and a conducive learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.36/5 from 22 reviews, approximately 91% highlight hands-on learning and supportive lecturers. A few mention limited practical facilities or a desire for more programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students highlight impactful community engagement and practical field-based learning experiences. Modern facilities, knowledgeable professors, and moderate fees are also mentioned.

With a 4.56/5 average rating from 9 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good professors, valuable education, and supportive learning environments. Some mention bureaucratic processes or compulsory hostel/feeding as minor drawbacks.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
40%
45%
43%
56%
0%
0%
4★
47%
30%
45%
57%
44%
0%
0%
3★
11%
30%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

My honest opinion

My honest opinion about central university I will say conducive atmosphere for studying. What I didn’t like I will say is lecturers do not pay much attention to students' reports (exams papers and end of semester results ), you will have to go to hell and back before you will finally get what has to be worked on done. I will suggest they pay more attention to students' needs. In all my stay at Central University was a good one.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close