Bashkir State University vs Bashkir State Agrarian University vs Ufa State Aviation Technical University - USATU vs Ufa State Petroleum Technological University - USPTU vs Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU

Side-by-side comparison from 111 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bashkir State University (5.00)
Bashkir State University: wins 0/7 categories
Bashkir State Agrarian University: wins 0/7 categories
Ufa State Aviation Technical University - USATU: wins 0/7 categories
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University - USPTU: wins 0/7 categories
Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU: wins 0/7 categories
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU: wins 2/7 categories
Eurasian Management and Administration School: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Sterlitamak, Russia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Germanic Languages
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Executive MBA
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
4.14
4.30
Win
Location
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.95
4.64
Win
4.34
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.10
4.18
4.78
Win
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.39
4.82
Win
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
4.85
Win
4.29
Value
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
4.33
4.88
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.93
3.66
4.23
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and accessible teaching
  • +Great opportunities for professional development and future careers
  • +Good living conditions and university facilities
  • +Competent teachers and strong training systems
  • +Good material base and sports facilities
  • +Effective career support and job prospects

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practical skills and real-world experience
  • +Supportive environment and positive social life
  • +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
  • +Advanced labs and modern equipment
  • +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
  • +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
  • +Practical, results-driven business education
  • +Actionable assignments and real-world application
  • +Experienced professors and industry insights
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a major concern.
  • -Ineffective communication and disorganization from administrative staff cause frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a recurring issue.
  • -Excessive administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of adequate academic support

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform rating across all evaluated aspects. With identical scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to report. The consistent zero in every category suggests a lack of differentiation in perceived quality across these key university metrics.

An assessment of the institution reveals a consistent lack of positive feedback across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no clear strengths or weaknesses to highlight. The university appears to have received uniform negative feedback in every surveyed area, suggesting significant areas for improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.

Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value** and **Internationality**, both scoring very high. **Professors** also receive a strong rating, indicating high academic quality. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are all rated solidly, suggesting a good overall student experience. The lowest-rated area, though still positive, is **Location**.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 15 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight excellent learning conditions, professional professors, and strong career prospects.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students praising the competent training system, knowledgeable teachers, and well-developed sports facilities. Some minor improvements were noted regarding initial hostel conditions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.

~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.82/5 from 49 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highly praise the school's practical, results-driven business education and real-world application. Modules and assignments are frequently highlighted for their immediate applicability.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
67%
0%
0%
38%
44%
82%
4★
0%
33%
0%
0%
50%
44%
18%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
11%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Polytechnic

'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.

A Premier Choice for Ambitious Business Leaders

If you’re looking for a practical, results-driven business education that makes a real impact, the Eurasian Management & Administration School (EMAS) is an excellent choice. EMAS stands out as one of the strongest business schools in Central and Eastern Europe, offering MBA, Executive MBA, DBA, and business coaching programs that focus on real-world implementation and strategic thinking. DBA at EMAS transformed my leadership and boosted my Business vision, it’s a Strategic DBA, that gives real business impact. The DBA sharpened my executive edge. In all it’s a Practical DBA, great support, real impact.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close