Universidad Regiomontana - U-ERRE vs Newton University vs Igbinedion University - IUO vs Fort Hays State University vs Ambrose Alli University - AAUE

Side-by-side comparison from 61 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: College of Health Technology - COHTECH (5.00)
Universidad Regiomontana - U-ERRE: wins 0/6 categories
Newton University: wins 3/6 categories
Igbinedion University - IUO: wins 0/6 categories
Fort Hays State University: wins 0/6 categories
Ambrose Alli University - AAUE: wins 0/6 categories
Universite Centrale - UC: wins 0/6 categories
College of Health Technology - COHTECH: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Prague, Czech Republic
4.50
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Global Business and Management
Best programme: Accounting
Fort Hays, Kansas, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Community Health
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.88
Win
3.82
3.50
3.12
Not rated
4.00
Location
3.00
4.57
3.64
5.00
2.94
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.00
4.86
Win
4.18
4.67
3.67
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
2.50
4.74
Win
3.91
4.00
3.39
Not rated
4.00
Student life
3.00
4.48
4.30
4.00
3.86
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.50
4.63
4.18
4.33
3.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.00
3.88
4.00
4.33
3.37
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, modern, and engaging teaching with real-world expertise
  • +Supportive, approachable, and friendly professors
  • +Flexible learning options and a strong sense of community
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Supportive campus environment and student well-being
  • +Focus on student development and value for money
  • +Accessible and flexible online programs
  • +Supportive faculty and liberal learning environment
  • +Rigorous and affordable education
  • +Supportive and intelligent lecturers
  • +Disciplined and knowledge-focused environment
  • +Amazing campus life and student support

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging learning activities, positive environment, and excellent lectures.
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or not updated.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor service delivery, including bribery.
  • -Insufficient funding for departments and lack of essential learning tools.
  • -Expensive transportation and numerous charges for school needs.

Nothing to show

  • -Ineffective and outdated teaching methods are a recurring concern.
  • -The institution suffers from poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution garners impressive scores across multiple aspects, with its **Facilities** and **Professors** standing out as exceptional strengths. **Internationality** also received a very positive evaluation. Conversely, **Accommodations** emerged as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement. The university also performed well in **Location** and **Value**, with **Student Life** being a solid, though not outstanding, component.

Student life stands out as the university's strongest aspect, receiving a high rating of 4.3. Professors and value also scored very well, both at 4.18. Accommodation follows closely with a rating of 4. The weakest area, based on these scores, is the university's location, rated at 3.64. Facilities and internationality also received solid, though not exceptional, marks.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback across various aspects. Its strongest points are overwhelmingly the **Location**, scoring a perfect 5, and **Professors**, with an impressive 4.67. Areas like **Accomodation** and **Value** also received high marks. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, rated at 3.5, suggesting room for improvement in this domain.

This institution presents a varied picture based on its ratings. Student life emerges as the strongest area, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, location received the lowest score, suggesting potential drawbacks in accessibility or surroundings. Other categories like professors, value, and internationality all received solid mid-range scores, painting a generally positive but not exceptional portrait of the university.

Nothing to show

This university garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in its Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value, all receiving a perfect score. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated at 4. Internationality is similarly strong with a score of 4. The weakest area, though still a strong score, is Facilities at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

All eight reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the practical, modern teaching, approachable and skilled professors, and a friendly, community atmosphere.

With an average rating of 4.27/5 from 11 reviews, ~73% of feedback is positive. Students praise amazing lecturers, a focus on total development, and a positive campus life. No negative feedback was provided.

All three reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight high-quality, flexible, and affordable online programs, supportive faculty, and a liberal learning environment.

About ~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, a disciplined environment, and valuable experiences. Negative feedback (~8.3%) mentions issues with infrastructure and administrative processes.

Nothing to show

With one review received, the university earns a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review was positive, highlighting great learning activities, environment, and lectures.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
55%
33%
28%
0%
100%
4★
0%
50%
18%
67%
33%
0%
0%
3★
100%
0%
27%
0%
31%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Highly practical school, would recommend

This university is perfect for someone who wants to work with school, some classes are online which means you can watch them whenever you have time. This uni teachers highly practical stuff, and people there are higly skilled and I would say more friendly than on other schools, you can talk to them like human beings and they will talk back as they talk with their collegues

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Not Very Satisfactory

This university has a long way to go in terms of numbers and quality care for their students and also in terms of preparing students for the outside world and I won't recommend it for anyone who wants quality education beyond the norm we experience here. In campus life what stood out for me was my final year project because I had the opportunity of doing a real-life project instead of using animals.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close