Bashkir State University vs Bashkortostan State Medical University vs Bashkir State Agrarian University vs Ufa State Aviation Technical University - USATU vs Ufa State Petroleum Technological University - USPTU

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bashkir State University (5.00)
Bashkir State University: wins 0/7 categories
Bashkortostan State Medical University: wins 0/7 categories
Bashkir State Agrarian University: wins 0/7 categories
Ufa State Aviation Technical University - USATU: wins 0/7 categories
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University - USPTU: wins 0/7 categories
Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU: wins 7/7 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Sterlitamak, Russia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Germanic Languages
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
Win
Not rated
Location
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.95
Win
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.10
Win
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
Win
Not rated
Value
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.93
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and accessible teaching
  • +Great opportunities for professional development and future careers
  • +Good living conditions and university facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Competent teachers and strong training systems
  • +Good material base and sports facilities
  • +Effective career support and job prospects

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practical skills and real-world experience
  • +Supportive environment and positive social life
  • +Quality teaching and engaging subjects

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a major concern.
  • -Ineffective communication and disorganization from administrative staff cause frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a recurring issue.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of adequate academic support

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform rating across all evaluated aspects. With identical scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to report. The consistent zero in every category suggests a lack of differentiation in perceived quality across these key university metrics.

Nothing to show

An assessment of the institution reveals a consistent lack of positive feedback across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no clear strengths or weaknesses to highlight. The university appears to have received uniform negative feedback in every surveyed area, suggesting significant areas for improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 15 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight excellent learning conditions, professional professors, and strong career prospects.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students praising the competent training system, knowledgeable teachers, and well-developed sports facilities. Some minor improvements were noted regarding initial hostel conditions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
0%
67%
0%
0%
38%
0%
4★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close