EADA Business School vs ESIC Business & Marketing School vs IE University vs Escuela International de Gerencia - EIG vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH
Side-by-side comparison from 543 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical programs from competent professors
- +Strong international environment and diverse student body
- +Real-world focus and hands-on learning experiences
- +Practical learning, real-world projects, and industry connections.
- +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable professors.
- +Supportive campus environment and strong academic/personal guidance.
- +Supportive faculty and personalized guidance for academic and career success.
- +Excellent facilities, enriching coursework, and practical skill development.
- +Abundant opportunities and networking for future career prospects.
- +Outstanding faculty support and engaging teaching.
- +Excellent facilities and resources for learning.
- +Guidance and opportunities for future career development.
- +Strong practical focus with real-world brand experience
- +Supportive teachers and excellent campus facilities/resources
- +Diverse, multicultural student body and environment
- +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors
- +Friendly and informal student-teacher atmosphere
- +Vibrant city experience with affordable living and cultural attractions
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and inflexibility.
- -Program content is sometimes too basic or not as promised.
- -Facilities are generally good but the learning environment can be rigid.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication regarding academic systems.
- -Lack of orientation and support for international students.
- -Misleading information about course delivery methods.
- -Disappointing academic quality and misleading marketing.
- -Poor program management and perceived lack of flexibility.
- -Uninspiring campus environment and limited student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and administrative support cause frustration.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistent complaints.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for many students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of empathy.
- -Poorly planned schedules and examination processes negatively impact students.
- -Outdated teaching methods and indifferent faculty further frustrate students.
Nothing to show
Remarkably, this institution scores highly across student life and internationality. Location stands out as its strongest attribute, boasting an impressive rating. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value also garnered positive, though not exceptional, feedback.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value** represent areas that received comparatively lower scores. Other aspects like professors, location, and student life fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Internationality stands out with an impressive rating, closely followed by an excellent score for Location. Student life and the quality of Professors also receive high marks. However, Accommodations represent the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Value for money and Facilities are rated favorably, though not as high as the top-performing categories.
Academic strengths significantly outshine other aspects, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality represent areas with lower scores. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately well, while Location and Value fall within a similar mid-range.
This university garners exceptionally high marks in internationality, boasting a rating of 4.65. Facilities also received strong acclaim at 4.56, closely followed by professors at 4.53 and value at 4.48. The student experience is well-regarded, with a 4.35 rating for student life. Location and accommodation represent the areas with the lowest scores, both falling in the upper 3-point range.
Overall, the university demonstrates a strong performance in student life and location, with ratings of 4.59 and 4.43 respectively. Internationality also scores highly at 4.31. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are its professors and facilities, receiving lower scores of 3.58 and 3.68. Accommodation and value for money also fall in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
With a 4.46 average rating, ~93% of reviews are positive, praising engaging, practical programs and a strong international environment. A small ~2.4% of feedback mentions issues with program communication and administrative inflexibility.
With 4.13 stars from 55 reviews, ~85% of students praise the collaborative learning, practical projects with real companies, and good teaching quality. One review found the university experience poor.
Approximately 96.7% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, supportive faculty, and enriching academic/networking opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about academic standards or the campus environment.
With a 4.07 average rating from 15 reviews, students praise the university's excellent facilities, engaging lecturers, and diverse program offerings. All feedback was positive, with no negative reviews received.
With ~94% positive sentiment, reviews highlight enriching theoretical and practical skills, multicultural environments, and helpful teachers. Some noted the campus is a bit far from the city. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 3.44/5, approximately 52% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, a vibrant city experience, and good professor-student relations. Around 14% of feedback is negative, noting issues with organization and administration.
Nothing to show
International Immersion: Transformative Leadership for Future Challenges – Program Review I had the opportunity to participate in the International Immersion program at EADA Business School, Barcelona, spending a month at the Barcelona campus and an additional week at the Collbató campus. The overall experience was highly enriching and impactful. The classroom sessions at the Barcelona campus were exceptionally interactive and engaging. The learning environment encouraged open dialogue, collaborative thinking, and the exchange of diverse perspectives among participants from different backgrounds. This significantly enhanced the depth of discussions and contributed to a well-rounded learning experience. The Collbató campus offered a distinctly immersive environment, combining experiential learning with outdoor activities. This setting complemented the academic sessions by fostering teamwork, reflection, and leadership development in a more informal yet highly effective context. Overall, the program was a valuable learning journey. While the immediate experience was positive, its true impact has become more evident over time. It has contributed meaningfully to my personal and professional development, particularly in enhancing my leadership perspective, cross-cultural understanding, and ability to navigate complex, real-world challenges.
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
I chose this university because some friends who had studied there had told me it was a great experience, and it's true. It has excellent facilities and a faculty that always encourages you to do your best. They motivate you a lot and guide you in a way I hadn't seen before. They are very approachable professors and are attentive to how they can optimize your studies. I made good friends there, I have good memories of that experience, and I might even pursue some further studies because it left a very positive impression on me.
Nothing to show
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
The academic content of the master has been very interesting to me and I think I have learned a lot. Coordination I think it can improve since in the subjects taught by more than one teacher I have identified a lack of coherence. In relation to the practices, several problems have arisen since, when working with the juvenile protection or penal system, on several occasions it has taken more than the appropriate period to accept the practices. Also the list of centers that were offered last year, at which point I had to choose, this year they were not offered. However, the content of the master seems very good to me.
Nothing to show
