University of Detroit Mercy vs The University of Auckland vs London Training for Excellence vs University of Waikato vs Auckland University of Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 102 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Passionate, world-class faculty and academic support
- +Quality education, resources, and learning environments
- +Strong career guidance and student backing
Nothing to show
- +Supportive staff and accessible resources
- +Relevant coursework and flexible learning options
- +Vibrant campus life and social opportunities
- +Hands-on learning and industry professionals
- +Supportive and collaborative student community
- +Diverse and practical course offerings
- +Engaging professors and interactive teaching methods
- +Strong focus on practical skills and real-world application
- +Inclusive and participatory learning environment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Inadequate faculty instruction and feedback quality.
- -Lack of student support services and social integration.
- -High cost not justified by the overall educational value.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities and equipment are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from staff is frequently unclear or lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a concern.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of engagement and outdated curriculum are disappointing.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, with its location and professors receiving the highest ratings. Student life and accommodation, while still respectable, present areas for potential improvement. The university also scores well in terms of internationality and value, indicating a generally positive overall student experience.
Nothing to show
An evaluation of the university reveals generally positive feedback, with standout scores for Facilities and Professors, both receiving high marks. Location and Internationality also perform well. Student Life emerged as the area with the lowest rating, while Accomodation and Value received solid scores, indicating a generally favorable university experience.
Overall, this institution receives strong marks, particularly for its **value**, which is the highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Professors** also score very well. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, where ratings are noticeably lower compared to other categories. Other factors like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are all rated positively and consistently.
This university garners strong marks in most areas, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Professors**, both rated at an impressive 4.53. **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also receive commendations, all scoring above 4.2. The standout weakest area is **Location**, with a rating of 3.56. Overall, the institution demonstrates a high level of satisfaction among students in academic and campus life aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Approximately 95% of reviews are positive, citing passionate lecturers, quality education, and ample resources. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions limited lecturer availability and insufficient feedback on assignments.
Nothing to show
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.42/5, students praise supportive staff, relevant coursework, and flexible learning options. The campus environment and social opportunities are also frequently highlighted.
Students highly praise the university, noting a supportive atmosphere, hands-on learning, and diverse program offerings. Friendly student interactions and helpful staff are frequently mentioned. No negative feedback was reported.
All 15 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise engaging classes, passionate professors, and effective teaching methods. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I found that the overall university experience was not really worth my time and money. Respected professors were only actually lecturing for 1-2 weeks per course, with PhD graduates teaching the majority of the course. Sometimes these PhD graduates weren't able to speak fluent English, which made the learning and teaching actually going on very questionable. In addition to this, you would submit a 3000 word essay, and receive a 15-20 words of feedback. I am certain that very little learning, improvement and education can occur when the feedback loop is so minimal, often generic. In addition to this, many of the "lab" or "tutorial" components were actually university students completing post-graduate experiments as part of their thesis studies. For example, in my psych201 tutorial, we had to spend 2 hours looking at a screen only pressing the "X" or "Z" key a total of 1200 times, and if we did not attend this lecture, we would lose 2% of our total grade. Overall, I question how much education and learning goes on, specifically in the Commerce and Science Faculties. I found my high school classes to go into more depth, with the teachers actually providing many one-on-one conversations to ensure learning is taking place, and this is the learnings that allowed me to pass my first 3 years of papers before any new content was covered, after which, the lectures would have half the class walk out because they couldn't speak fluent english, with students opting to self-teach themselves. If you are requiring students to partake in a study, they must be reimbursed for their time, especially if no learning is taking place. If you are charging students $1000 per course, then the university can afford to pay for staff to assess all of the PHD candidates fluency in English, before they are allowed to teach. In addition, no learning can take place when a question is asked in a foreign language, and the tutor/lecturer replies in a foreign language.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
