Villanueva University vs Vytautas Magnus University - VDU vs Rzeszow University of Technology vs Reutlingen University vs The State University of Zanzibar

Side-by-side comparison from 68 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Rzeszow University of Technology (4.60)
Villanueva University: wins 0/7 categories
Vytautas Magnus University - VDU: wins 3/7 categories
Rzeszow University of Technology: wins 4/7 categories
Reutlingen University: wins 0/7 categories
The State University of Zanzibar: wins 0/7 categories
The State University of Zanzibar: wins 0/7 categories
Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Aeronautics and Space Technology
Reutlingen, Germany
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.54
Win
4.14
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.14
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.14
4.55
4.71
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.86
4.63
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.43
4.49
Win
4.43
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.71
4.45
4.86
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.14
4.15
4.29
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated and helpful academic staff
  • +Motivating and engaging learning environment
  • +Excellent facilities and practical career focus
  • +Supportive and friendly lecturers
  • +International environment and community
  • +Flexible study options and diverse activities
  • +Strong technical programs and practical learning opportunities
  • +High-quality teaching from qualified professors
  • +Excellent career preparation and industry connections

Nothing to show

  • +Conducive study environment and good faculty
  • +Cooperative and nice fellow students
  • +Variety of faculties and programs

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching and poor course content are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder learning.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university exhibits a mixed performance across its assessed aspects. Its strongest areas are clearly Facilities, Professors, and Location, all receiving ratings above four. Conversely, Internationality and Accommodation represent the weakest points, with scores below three. Student Life and Value fall in the mid-range, indicating moderate satisfaction in these aspects.

This institution garners very positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.538), indicating excellent global reach and campus resources. Professors also receive a high score (4.55). The weakest area is Accomodation (4.15), suggesting room for improvement in student housing provisions. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and generally well-regarded experience for its students.

This institution garners exceptional scores across multiple categories, with its **Location** receiving a perfect rating. Areas of notable strength also include **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring very highly. Conversely, **Internationality** is the lowest-rated aspect, though still a respectable score. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation also received positive feedback.

Nothing to show

A notable strength of this institution is its prime **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. **Student life** and **accommodation** also score well, both at 4. The university's **facilities** are rated adequately at 3.5, while **internationality** and the overall **value** proposition are rated at 3. The area with the lowest score is **professors**, at 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~56% of reviews being positive, students highlight good teachers, engaging academics, and supportive staff. Facilities are also noted as modern. No negative feedback was recorded.

With ~88% positive feedback, reviews highlight inspiring academic experiences, supportive lecturers, and a friendly international environment. Opportunities for growth, flexible studies, and an active student community are frequently praised. No negative reviews were recorded.

All seven reviews are positive, averaging 4.57/5 stars. Students praise modern facilities, strong industry connections for internships and practical projects, and highly qualified professors. Learning possibilities and opportunities for dual-subject studies are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

With one positive review out of two, this university receives a 3.5/5 average rating. Positive feedback highlights a conducive study environment and a variety of faculties. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
11%
58%
57%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
44%
30%
43%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
44%
12%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Very good experience

It is a relatively new university being my promotion in 2019 the first. The professors are very competent and not only give you the necessary knowledge but they plant the seed of curiosity and interest in this matter. As a graduate in psychology, I can say that the agendas They have been very interesting and with group dynamics every four months. The facilities are quite new within a small university.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close