Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria vs EUDE Business School vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez - UNESR vs Karabük University vs International Scientific Educational Centre NAS RA - ISEC
Side-by-side comparison from 82 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, applied learning focused on job opportunities.
- +Ambitious environment with opportunities for growth and professional development.
- +Excellent facilities, supportive professors, and diverse programs.
- +Flexible learning and retake options
- +Diverse extracurricular activities
- +Strong MBA and HR programs
- +Dynamic and accessible educational environment with committed professors.
- +Diverse and flexible academic programs.
- +Encouragement of creativity, research, and social commitment.
- +Academic excellence and comprehensive programs
- +Supportive international student services and community
- +Enriching campus life and cultural experiences
- +Research opportunities and advanced degrees
- +Distance learning flexibility
- +Wide range of specializations
- +Dedicated, knowledgeable faculty and effective program delivery.
- +Supportive student community and conducive learning environment.
- +Timely graduations and successful student outcomes.
- +Academic excellence and research opportunities
- +Holistic development and personal growth
- +Strong faculty support and guidance
- -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on revenue over student development.
- -Outdated and ineffective teaching methods with unmotivated professors and overcrowded classes.
- -Lack of practical experience, irrelevant coursework, and poor campus organization.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of student support and resources leads to feeling unheard and unsupported.
- -Poor academic organization and lack of essential resources like laboratories.
- -Frequent absence of teaching staff due to low salaries and poor compensation.
- -University unpreparedness for complex degree programs.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unnecessary requirements and poor decision-making.
- -Negative and discriminatory treatment experienced by students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Unprofessional behavior from university staff.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Uninspiring curriculum
- -Restrictive environment
This university garners positive marks, with accommodation and student life standing out as its strongest areas, both exceeding 3.3. Location and value also receive solid ratings. Conversely, the university's professors and internationality are rated lowest, falling just below 3. These aspects represent opportunities for improvement.
Across all assessed categories, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The absence of any positive or negative scores suggests a neutral outcome in every surveyed aspect of the university experience.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Professors and student life stand out as particular strengths. However, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating a significant area for improvement. The university also scored moderately well in facilities, location, internationality, and value, suggesting a generally satisfactory, though not exceptional, experience in these regards.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its **location**, scoring a high 4.25. Performance in **professors** is also commendable at 4. Conversely, **internationality** emerges as the weakest area with a score of 2.75. Other aspects such as facilities, student life, and accommodation fall within a similar range, with the value for money rated at a respectable 3.5.
An overwhelmingly positive evaluation is presented, with the institution achieving perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, and Location. Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality are also strong, each receiving a commendable rating of 4. Value for money is similarly rated as excellent. The institution's primary strengths lie in its exceptional facilities, faculty, and prime location, while areas like student engagement and housing are rated very well, indicating a consistently high standard across most aspects.
Academic staff and the overall value proposition are notable strengths, indicated by high scores for Professors (4.32) and Value (4.26). Student Life (4.12) and Location (4.13) also received positive evaluations. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities (3.75) and Accomodation (3.6), which received the lowest ratings. Internationality (3.74) sits mid-range in the provided feedback.
This university presents a strong academic offering, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.5. Value for money is also well-regarded at 4.25. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation, all averaging around 3.67. Internationality also scores moderately well at 3.75.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities and practical learning. The remaining 16% are negative, citing poor organization and unmotivated professors. The average rating is 3.28/5.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. This indicates a highly satisfactory experience with no reported negative feedback.
90% of reviewers praise the dynamic environment, quality professors, and diverse programs. One reviewer noted concerns about professor feedback and missing faculty, representing 10% of feedback.
With a 4/5 average rating, ~75% of students report a positive experience, highlighting academic quality, facilities, and a vibrant campus life. ~25% of feedback mentions negative aspects, including administrative issues and discriminatory treatment.
With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university has overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students appreciate opportunities for research involvement and the flexibility of distance learning.
With a 4.32 average rating from 19 reviews, most students praise knowledgeable faculty, supportive communities, and timely graduations. A small percentage (~5%) noted unprofessional social media activity.
University reviews are largely positive, with 75% of feedback being 4-5 stars. Students praise academic excellence, holistic development, and a supportive learning environment. A small portion of feedback (25%) notes a strict atmosphere, likening it to a school.
I was here on Erasmus for 1 year and the experience was really excellent. Compared to Italian universities, it is much more practical and applied, with lighter study loads but more focused on a job opportunity. The professors are very friendly and willing to help, especially Erasmus students. I am really satisfied with my experience, the only complaint would be about the economics courses which are not very varied especially the masters and the internationalization office which is quite inefficient and slow
Nothing to show
The Simón Rodríguez University had many shortcomings in terms of the study and organization to teach the degree in veterinary medicine, there were not even laboratories and the teaching staff was very infrequent due to the very low salary that the teachers received for their work, the university did not I was prepared to take on a career of that magnitude.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This is a university yet allows their Social Media people to spend all day trolling facebook football sites. How can this place be taken seriously? If you want to know more just go look at the forum posting activity, how unprofessional for an academic institution - tells you all you need to know
Amrita University provided a transformative experience during my graduation. With its excellent academic framework, experienced faculty, and state-of-the-art infrastructure, it fostered both intellectual and personal growth. The curriculum balanced theoretical knowledge with practical application, and research opportunities were abundant. Campus life was vibrant, with diverse extracurricular activities that encouraged holistic development. The university’s focus on ethics, compassion, and global exposure shaped me into a responsible individual. The inclusive environment, cultural diversity, and strong values helped me grow academically and socially, making Amrita a remarkable institution that prepares students for success in both their careers and life.
