Aristotle University of Thessaloniki - AUTH vs Universidad de Nariño - Udenar vs Institute of European Design - IED vs Saint Mary’s University vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA
Side-by-side comparison from 135 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and respected degree
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Vibrant campus and city life
Nothing to show
- +Practical, project-based learning with industry collaboration
- +Professional and dedicated teachers offering new perspectives
- +Diverse, international environment with modern facilities and opportunities
- +High-quality, challenging business programs with experienced faculty.
- +Supportive and welcoming environment, including for international students and athletes.
- +Small class sizes and strong professor-student relationships.
Nothing to show
- +Practical and well-rounded curriculum with strong foundational and specialized courses.
- +Supportive professors and engaging classes fostering critical thinking and personal growth.
- +Active campus life with numerous opportunities for community involvement and development.
- +Quality education and experienced, supportive faculty
- +Positive, calm, and friendly academic environment
- +Strong reputation and opportunities for personal and academic growth
- -Administrative and management issues create a negative student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and safety.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and irrelevant course content are recurring problems.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of instructor support are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of quality classes and fair exam assessments.
- -Poor academic environment and lack of real learning.
- -Overemphasis on memorization over understanding.
Per the provided ratings, the university excels in its **Location**, boasting the highest score. **Student Life** and **Value** also received strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Facilities** are identified as areas needing improvement, receiving the lowest scores. **Professors** and **Internationality** fall within the mid-range of ratings.
Nothing to show
This university receives excellent marks for its **facilities**, earning a remarkable 4.7 out of 5. Other strong areas include **value** (4.6) and **location** and **internationality** (both 4.4). **Professors** and **student life** are also well-regarded, scoring 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The primary area for improvement is **accommodation**, which received a lower rating of 3.
This university garners impressive scores in several key areas. Its location and student life are particularly strong, both exceeding 4.5. Professors also receive high marks, as does its internationality and value. Accommodations stand out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.56. Facilities also rate moderately well at 4.125.
Nothing to show
This university garners exceptional scores across multiple facets. Professors and student life are rated a perfect 5, alongside location and overall value. Facilities and accommodation also receive high marks at 4.5. Internationality is similarly strong, also rated 4.5. Notably, the only areas not reaching a perfect score are facilities, accommodation, and internationality, all of which are still highly commendable.
Academic excellence shines through with professors receiving a strong 4.44, indicating a highly regarded faculty. Facilities and value are also solid, both scoring 3.89. Student life and location are rated similarly at 3.75. The university's weakest area is internationality, with a score of 3.67, suggesting room for growth in global engagement. Overall, the institution presents a well-rounded experience with a particular emphasis on teaching quality.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting high academic quality, respected degrees, and a vibrant campus experience. Negative feedback (~6%) mentions issues with outdated facilities and inconsistent professor quality.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5 from 7 reviews, students praise diverse learning opportunities and the practical, project-based approach. Teachers are highly regarded for their professional expertise. Negative feedback is minimal.
All 17 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.35/5. Students frequently praise the quality of education and faculty experience, particularly within the business program.
Nothing to show
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the comprehensive curriculum, practical application of knowledge, and engaging classes. Supportive professors and active campus life were also highlighted.
Around 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality education, experienced faculty, and a good academic environment. Two reviews, approximately 22%, express dissatisfaction with class frequency and assessment fairness.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has been one of the fundamental education poles in my homeland. It has served as a national and global educational and research center for many decades now. Many notable and acknowledged scientists and teachers have graduated from AUTH. As far as the pros are concerned I could highlight the high level of education,nice and equipped labs and libraries, specific and accurate nodules timetable amd schedule and spacy and pleasant university campus. Regarding the cons of this institute, I tend to underline the poor level of communication between the professors and the students (it was a bit difficult to get in touch with the academic staff), and the mediocre level of the electronic platforms and access to open electronic libraries etc.(websites under maintenance, not user friendly student platforms and not very attractive interface)
Nothing to show
I really enjoy the program because of the projects, at IED we don’t have too many theory classes instead we do projects. It’s very interesting because it allows me to be creative while also changing my perspective on design. The university has very nice and good teachers and we have access to very modern equipment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
