University of Novi Sad - UNS vs HEC Paris vs University of Lausanne - UNIL vs Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University - ATBU, Bauchi vs Marwadi University - Marawadi

Side-by-side comparison from 116 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University - ATBU, Bauchi (4.40)
University of Novi Sad - UNS: wins 2/7 categories
HEC Paris: wins 1/7 categories
University of Lausanne - UNIL: wins 2/7 categories
Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University - ATBU, Bauchi: wins 0/7 categories
Marwadi University - Marawadi: wins 2/7 categories
The Millennium Universal College: wins 0/7 categories
Sohag University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Paris, France
4.00
Read more reviews
34 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Biological Science
Best programme: Applied Geology
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Sohag, Egypt
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.06
4.00
3.93
4.29
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.80
Win
3.76
4.50
4.33
3.57
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.15
4.00
4.75
Win
4.44
4.43
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.66
4.41
Win
3.75
3.63
4.14
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.73
Win
4.24
4.00
4.40
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.22
4.24
4.50
Win
4.44
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.80
3.94
3.75
3.47
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse programs and specialization options
  • +Practical skills and internship opportunities
  • +Accessible professors and good facilities
  • +Strong academic programs and expert faculty
  • +Excellent personal and professional growth opportunities
  • +Supportive and engaging community and peers
  • +Supportive lecturers & practical courses
  • +Active student life & events
  • +Flexible major changes
  • +Friendly and supportive lecturers and positive student-lecturer relationships.
  • +Conducive and serene learning environment with technology focus.
  • +Affordable tuition fees and practical, relevant course delivery.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical and research-focused learning
  • +Diverse and international student community

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated materials and faculty, coupled with a lack of practical application.
  • -High tuition fees are a significant concern given the perceived value.
  • -Limited career prospects in the field after graduation.
  • -Administrative and organizational inefficiencies are a major problem.
  • -Teaching quality is perceived as poor, with a lack of diverse perspectives.
  • -Career prospects and the school's reputation outside of France are concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a constant problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and administration create frustration.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date with industry demands.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and equipment are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and delivery methods are frequently perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in Location and Student Life, both receiving scores close to 4.8. Professors and Value also received strong marks. However, areas for improvement are evident in Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories.

The university garners strong ratings across several aspects, with **Internationality** being its standout achievement at 4.41. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, both scoring 4.24. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area, rated at 3.76. Facilities and accommodation are generally well-regarded, while professors also maintain a solid score.

This institution garners praise for its academic offerings and setting, with Professors scoring an impressive 4.75 and Location an equally strong 4.5. Student Life and Facilities are rated well at 4, while Value also stands out at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, both receiving a 3.75.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring an impressive 4.44. **Student Life** also receives high marks at 4.4. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.47. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and student experience. Professors are rated exceptionally well, and the university also scores highly for its facilities, student life, and value. Accommodation and internationality are also positive aspects. However, the location received a comparatively lower rating.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.24/5, ~74% of 54 reviews are positive, praising the beautiful campus, diverse programs, and student opportunities. A single negative review mentioned difficult faculty and outdated materials.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent learning environments, professors, and community. A small percentage (~8.8%) of negative feedback mentions administrative inefficiencies and concerns about curriculum organization.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight supportive lecturers, well-structured courses, and good campus life.

With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 16 reviews, ~88% are positive. Students praise friendly lecturers, conducive learning environments, and relevant practical/theory teachings. No negative reviews were recorded.

All seven reviews are positive, averaging 4.29 out of 5 stars. Students highlight supportive teachers, practical learning, and a lively, clean campus with opportunities for networking and research.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
46%
35%
20%
56%
29%
0%
0%
4★
33%
44%
80%
31%
71%
0%
0%
3★
19%
12%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Diversity and quality of fellow students

Very international and interesting place to be and opens a lot of opportunities, however the administration is very french and facilities are subpar (gym, classrooms) meaning the academic affairs is pretty much useless and lastly we are graded on a curve which can create a toxic environment because of the competition. With that being said the pros outweighs the cons by far.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close