University of Novi Sad - UNS vs Universidad Autónoma de Durango - UAD vs Ecole des Ponts Business School vs University of Cândido Mendes - UCAM vs Central Methodist University - CMU

Side-by-side comparison from 79 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Novi Sad - UNS: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Durango - UAD: wins 5/6 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 0/6 categories
University of Cândido Mendes - UCAM: wins 0/6 categories
Central Methodist University - CMU: wins 1/6 categories
Brno University of Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Cavendish University Uganda - CUU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Fashion Design
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Information and Communication Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
4.50
Not rated
3.00
4.33
4.50
Location
4.80
5.00
Win
4.60
Not rated
2.00
4.67
4.50
Professors
4.15
5.00
Win
4.83
Not rated
4.00
4.17
4.50
Internationality
3.66
3.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
4.00
Student life
4.73
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
3.00
4.67
4.00
Value
4.22
5.00
Win
4.17
Not rated
4.00
4.33
4.50
Accommodation
3.80
5.00
Win
3.33
Not rated
4.00
3.83
2.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse programs and specialization options
  • +Practical skills and internship opportunities
  • +Accessible professors and good facilities
  • +Excellent teachers and well-trained staff
  • +Good and comfortable facilities
  • +Positive learning atmosphere and student-teacher respect
  • +Transformative personal and professional growth
  • +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
  • +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses

Nothing to show

  • +Friendly environment and supportive community
  • +Strong athletics programs and athlete support
  • +Strong interdisciplinary programmes and innovation culture
  • +Excellent facilities, cutting-edge labs, and industry collaboration
  • +Vibrant student community and city integration
  • +Diverse and inclusive international environment
  • +Smooth and enjoyable user experience
Cons
  • -Outdated materials and faculty, coupled with a lack of practical application.
  • -High tuition fees are a significant concern given the perceived value.
  • -Limited career prospects in the field after graduation.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum delivery.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency exacerbate problems.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and career relevance is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are recurring concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in Location and Student Life, both receiving scores close to 4.8. Professors and Value also received strong marks. However, areas for improvement are evident in Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories.

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, with professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value all receiving perfect marks. Facilities are rated highly at a commendable four out of five. The university's internationality is its weakest point, scoring three out of five. Overall, it presents a very strong offering with minor room for improvement in global engagement.

Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its international student community, receiving a perfect score of 5. Accommodation and the quality of its professors are also highly regarded, both earning a 4. Conversely, the university's location is its weakest aspect, scoring a low 2. Facilities and student life are rated moderately, with a score of 3 each. Overall value for money is considered good, indicated by a 4.

This institution receives particularly strong acclaim for its **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.7. **Internationality** also ranks highly at 4.5. While most aspects are rated positively, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.8. **Facilities** and **Value** are solid with scores of 4.3, and **Professors** are rated 4.2.

This institution garners excellent scores in key areas such as facilities, professors, and location, all receiving a strong 4.5. Internationality also scores well at 4. Student life is rated a respectable 4. However, a notable weakness emerges in accommodation, with a significantly lower rating of 2.5, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.24/5, ~74% of 54 reviews are positive, praising the beautiful campus, diverse programs, and student opportunities. A single negative review mentioned difficult faculty and outdated materials.

The overwhelming majority (~100%) of reviews are highly positive, praising excellent facilities, well-trained teachers, and a positive student/teacher atmosphere. No negative feedback was recorded.

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its friendly atmosphere and supportive environment. Athletics are highlighted as a significant positive aspect.

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.17/5. Students praise the university's interdisciplinary programs, innovation culture, modern facilities, and supportive community, alongside the student-friendly city of Brno.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, both reviews are positive. Students highlight a smooth and enjoyable experience with a diverse environment and welcoming staff.

Rating distribution
5★
46%
60%
50%
0%
0%
17%
50%
4★
33%
30%
50%
0%
100%
83%
50%
3★
19%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Journey of growth

Truly since I left college to university have seen real life adventure at Cavendish university Uganda.in that it blends all students from like 30 nationalities in Africa and out.Thus environment gave me how different students navigate life and ambitions varing from talent to growing careers.cavendish is starting place for diversities where no students is left out in all aspects.since all views are always welcome by staff.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close