University of Novi Sad - UNS vs Universidad Autónoma de Durango - UAD vs The BD School vs Ecole des Ponts Business School vs University of Cândido Mendes - UCAM

Side-by-side comparison from 74 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Novi Sad - UNS: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Durango - UAD: wins 5/7 categories
The BD School: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 1/7 categories
University of Cândido Mendes - UCAM: wins 0/7 categories
Central Methodist University - CMU: wins 1/7 categories
Chinhoyi University of Technology - CUT: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Fashion Design
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Interational Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.67
Location
4.80
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.60
Not rated
2.00
4.33
Professors
4.15
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.83
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.66
3.00
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.33
Student life
4.73
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Value
4.22
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.17
Not rated
4.00
4.33
Accommodation
3.80
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
4.00
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse programs and specialization options
  • +Practical skills and internship opportunities
  • +Accessible professors and good facilities
  • +Excellent teachers and well-trained staff
  • +Good and comfortable facilities
  • +Positive learning atmosphere and student-teacher respect

Nothing to show

  • +Transformative personal and professional growth
  • +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
  • +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses

Nothing to show

  • +Friendly environment and supportive community
  • +Strong athletics programs and athlete support
  • +Practical, skill-focused learning with supportive staff
  • +Affordable tuition and vibrant campus environment
  • +Innovative programs and opportunities for personal growth
Cons
  • -Outdated materials and faculty, coupled with a lack of practical application.
  • -High tuition fees are a significant concern given the perceived value.
  • -Limited career prospects in the field after graduation.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum delivery.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency exacerbate problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a persistent problem.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in Location and Student Life, both receiving scores close to 4.8. Professors and Value also received strong marks. However, areas for improvement are evident in Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories.

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, with professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value all receiving perfect marks. Facilities are rated highly at a commendable four out of five. The university's internationality is its weakest point, scoring three out of five. Overall, it presents a very strong offering with minor room for improvement in global engagement.

Nothing to show

Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its international student community, receiving a perfect score of 5. Accommodation and the quality of its professors are also highly regarded, both earning a 4. Conversely, the university's location is its weakest aspect, scoring a low 2. Facilities and student life are rated moderately, with a score of 3 each. Overall value for money is considered good, indicated by a 4.

This institution receives particularly strong marks for its **Location** and **Value**, both scoring 4.5. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.25. Areas showing room for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.75. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.24/5, ~74% of 54 reviews are positive, praising the beautiful campus, diverse programs, and student opportunities. A single negative review mentioned difficult faculty and outdated materials.

The overwhelming majority (~100%) of reviews are highly positive, praising excellent facilities, well-trained teachers, and a positive student/teacher atmosphere. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its friendly atmosphere and supportive environment. Athletics are highlighted as a significant positive aspect.

All four reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight practical learning, supportive lecturers, and affordable tuition as key strengths.

Rating distribution
5★
46%
60%
0%
50%
0%
0%
33%
4★
33%
30%
0%
50%
0%
100%
67%
3★
19%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close