Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira - UTP vs University of Novi Sad - UNS vs Loras College vs Upper School of Arts and Design - ESAD.CR vs Afe Babalola University - ABUAD

Side-by-side comparison from 96 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira - UTP: wins 0/4 categories
University of Novi Sad - UNS: wins 1/4 categories
Loras College: wins 0/4 categories
Upper School of Arts and Design - ESAD.CR: wins 2/4 categories
Afe Babalola University - ABUAD: wins 0/4 categories
Columbia State Community College: wins 0/4 categories
University of Maryland Baltimore County - UMBC : wins 1/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Dubuque, Iowa, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations and Diplomacy
Columbia, Tennessee, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.00
Not rated
3.00
4.17
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.83
4.80
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.07
Not rated
4.33
Professors
4.50
4.15
Not rated
4.00
4.17
Not rated
4.50
Internationality
4.00
3.66
Not rated
5.00
3.93
Not rated
5.00
Student life
4.33
4.73
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Value
4.50
4.22
Not rated
3.00
4.17
Not rated
4.50
Accommodation
3.83
3.80
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality academic programs and excellent professors
  • +Beautiful and well-equipped campus with ample student opportunities
  • +Positive learning environment with great minds and personal growth potential
  • +Diverse programs and specialization options
  • +Practical skills and internship opportunities
  • +Accessible professors and good facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent lecturers and learning environment
  • +Strong academic quality and personal development
  • +Modern facilities and resources

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive academic environment and approachable professors
  • +Strong career support and diverse opportunities
  • +Welcoming and inclusive campus community
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum is disappointing.
  • -Outdated materials and faculty, coupled with a lack of practical application.
  • -High tuition fees are a significant concern given the perceived value.
  • -Limited career prospects in the field after graduation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Authoritarian management and suppressed student rights.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Unclear academic processes and poor communication.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

With excellent scores across several key areas, this institution shines particularly bright in terms of **Location**, earning a near-perfect 4.83. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received strong marks at 4.5. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are well-regarded, while **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest, though still respectable, rating of 3.83.

Overall, this university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in Location and Student Life, both receiving scores close to 4.8. Professors and Value also received strong marks. However, areas for improvement are evident in Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Academic aspects and overall value receive high marks, with Facilities, Professors, and Value all scoring an impressive 4.17. Student Life and Accommodation are also well-regarded at 4.0. Internationality shows a strong score of 3.93. The university's weakest area, according to the ratings, is its Location, which received a score of 3.07.

Nothing to show

This institution excels with perfect scores in Facilities and Internationality. Professors and Value also received strong ratings, alongside Accomodation and Location which performed well. Student Life, however, stands out as a weaker area compared to the other evaluated aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise the beautiful campus, excellent professors, strong academic programs (especially engineering), and numerous student opportunities.

With an average rating of 4.24/5, ~74% of 54 reviews are positive, praising the beautiful campus, diverse programs, and student opportunities. A single negative review mentioned difficult faculty and outdated materials.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

~96.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting competent lecturers, good learning environments, and modern facilities. A small percentage of negative feedback mentioned authoritarian founder and trampled rights.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.75/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight a supportive academic environment, strong career preparation, and campus inclusivity. There are no negative reviews in this sample.

Rating distribution
5★
75%
46%
0%
0%
41%
0%
75%
4★
25%
33%
0%
0%
48%
0%
25%
3★
0%
19%
0%
100%
7%
0%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

LL.B

I studied law and it was theoretical and practical. The lecturers were good and they tried to be hands-on with the students. The university always upgraded itself. It always looked for ways to be better for the students

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close