Escuela Bancaria y Comercial - EBC vs Université Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella vs The University of Hagen - FU Hagen vs University of Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed - Bediaf ryad vs School of Electrical and Energetic Engineering of Oran

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed - Bediaf ryad (4.50)
Escuela Bancaria y Comercial - EBC: wins 3/4 categories
Université Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella: wins 0/4 categories
The University of Hagen - FU Hagen: wins 0/4 categories
University of Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed - Bediaf ryad: wins 1/4 categories
School of Electrical and Energetic Engineering of Oran: wins 0/4 categories
University of Science and Technology Mohamed Boudiaf - Usto-MB: wins 0/4 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: BBA International Business
Best programme: Media
Best programme: Educational Psychology
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
1.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.50
Internationality
3.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
2.50
Student life
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.00
4.00
1.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.50
Not rated
4.00
4.50
2.00
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
3.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
1.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical application of theory with real-world relevance
  • +Career flexibility and diverse job opportunities
  • +Instructors with industry experience and business acumen

Nothing to show

  • +Structured and easy-to-follow materials
  • +Facilitates self-paced learning
  • +Excellent professors and dedicated faculty
  • +Strong academic programs and learning opportunities
  • +Fostering autonomy and lifelong learning

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently cited.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and a disconnect with course material are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness from staff are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently criticized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives particularly high marks for its vibrant Student Life, scoring a perfect 5. The Location and Value are also strong points, both rated at 4.5. Conversely, Internationality is the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3, with Accomodation also scoring slightly lower at 3.5. Facilities and Professors are rated solidly at 4.

Nothing to show

This university presents a largely positive picture, with impressive scores for facilities, professors, location, and overall value, all rated a strong 4 out of 5. Internationality also scores moderately well at 3. However, student life is a significant weakness, receiving a low rating of 2. Accommodation is notably absent from positive feedback, scoring a 0, indicating a critical area for improvement.

This institution demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its high rating for **Internationality**, earning a perfect score. Overall, facilities, professors, location, student life, and value are all highly regarded. The weakest area, though still respectable, is accommodation, which received a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All three reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the practical application of theory, teachers' industry experience, and the broad career opportunities offered by their degrees.

Nothing to show

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback being favorable and an average rating of 4/5. The reviewer highlights excellent course structure and clear learning materials. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, feedback is ~100% positive. Students praise excellent professors and a commitment to maximizing learning opportunities and fostering autonomy.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
67%
0%
100%
50%
0%
0%
50%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
50%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close