Technical University of Kenya vs KCA University vs University of Eldoret vs Daystar University vs Africa Nazarene University

Side-by-side comparison from 166 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Eldoret (4.80)
Technical University of Kenya: wins 0/6 categories
KCA University: wins 1/6 categories
University of Eldoret: wins 0/6 categories
Daystar University: wins 0/6 categories
Africa Nazarene University: wins 4/6 categories
Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC: wins 1/6 categories
Tharaka University - TUN: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Nairobi, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
71 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Technology
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Statistics and Programming
Nairobi, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
42 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.10
4.32
4.41
4.48
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.36
4.46
4.71
4.27
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.33
4.49
Win
4.39
4.26
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.83
4.25
4.28
4.36
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Student life
3.76
4.44
4.53
4.24
4.67
Win
3.00
Not rated
Value
4.27
4.61
4.67
4.52
4.67
4.50
Not rated
Accommodation
3.31
3.65
4.31
3.93
4.67
Win
3.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, hands-on technical education
  • +Quality of lecturers and specialized equipment
  • +Strong industry integration and career preparation
  • +Practical and well-structured programs with supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Quality education and career-oriented focus
  • +Positive campus environment for collaboration and personal development
  • +Supportive and devoted lecturers
  • +Opportunities for innovation and career growth
  • +Positive campus environment and diverse student body
  • +Engaging and practical academic programs with knowledgeable, supportive lecturers
  • +Student-centered approach with responsive administration and flexible course options
  • +Enriching student life through fun events, trips, and diverse learning environments
  • +Diverse programs, mission-driven academics, and faculty expertise.
  • +Ethical development and Christian values integration.
  • +Culturally rich environment and international exposure.
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness
  • +Personal and talent growth opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are not universally well-equipped for all courses.
  • -Lack of recommendation for the university overall.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are not engaging or relevant.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Concerns about bias and institutional agendas impact academic integrity.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably location (4.36) and professors (4.33). Value for money also scores highly at 4.27. The institution's weakest points appear to be accommodation (3.31) and student life (3.76). Internationality sits in the middle ground at 3.83.

This university excels in several key areas, with particularly high marks for Value (4.61), Professors (4.49), and Location (4.46). Student Life and Internationality also received strong scores, indicating a vibrant and diverse campus experience. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a considerably lower rating of 3.65.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **location** (4.71) and **value** (4.67), indicating these are key strengths. **Student life** also scores well at 4.53. The **facilities** (4.41), **professors** (4.39), and **accommodation** (4.31) are all rated positively. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **internationality** (4.28).

Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance, with exceptional ratings in **Value** (4.52) and **Facilities** (4.48). **Internationality** (4.36) also received high marks. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, scoring 3.93. Other aspects like Professors, Location, and Student Life are rated favorably, generally above 4.2.

This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas, notably in facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors also earned a strong rating of 4.33. Location is the sole category with a slightly lower score, receiving a 4.

This university garners excellent scores for its location, achieving a perfect 5. Its facilities and professors also stand out with strong 4-star ratings, complemented by a solid 4.5 for value. Areas for development include student life and accommodation, both scoring a respectable 3 to 3.5 stars. Internationality also received a positive 4-star rating.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.23/5 from 30 reviews, approximately 97% are positive. Students praise practical learning, technical programs, and experienced faculty. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with specific course equipment and administrative helpfulness.

With ~93% positive reviews, students praise the university for its rewarding academic programs, well-structured curriculum, and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers. Practical learning and a collaborative campus environment are frequently highlighted.

With an average rating of 4.78/5, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise brilliant, supportive lecturers and a great environment, though some mention limited resources like internet and computers, and the cold weather.

A significant majority (~97.6%) of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging academics, supportive lecturers, and student-centered approaches. A single negative review mentioned potential influence from powerful groups.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, reviews highlight strong program diversity, mission-driven academics, and a vibrant campus with international exposure. Students also appreciate the ethical and moral development offered, though one mentions the university is expensive.

With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight strong practical skill development and opportunities to foster personal talents. No negative comments were received.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
43%
63%
78%
62%
67%
0%
0%
4★
43%
27%
22%
29%
33%
100%
0%
3★
10%
10%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
🌟🌟🌟🌟☆ (4 out of 5 stars)

My experience at the Technical University of Kenya was largely positive. The university offers a hands-on approach to learning, especially in technical and engineering programmes, which helped me build practical skills that I continue to use in my career. The curriculum is well-structured and industry-oriented, and most lecturers are knowledgeable and supportive. The location in the heart of Nairobi is a big plus—easy access to internships, job opportunities, and professional networking events. The university also encourages innovation and project-based learning, which makes the learning experience more dynamic. However, some areas need improvement. Administrative processes can be slow, and facilities like labs or libraries may not always be up to standard or well-equipped. Internet access on campus was also inconsistent at times. Overall, I would recommend TUK to students who are looking for a solid technical education with a practical focus. It's a good option for students who are self-driven and can make the most out of the available resources.

My university

I joined this university, not because it offers a high education but because of its conducive environment and supportive lecturers and professors. You can find people with different cultural backgrounds, which makes the university inclusive. One problem that the university shares with most universities in Nairobi, is the lack of ergonomic chairs in ICT rooms and the library.

School as a flame of knowledge.

It is a good place to learn and fully explore your career. What I like is the commitment of the staff to make the school a better place. And what I dislike is the cold weather that makes school experience bad ,at times. I recommend that the school to have enough infrastructure for the well being of the students especially the lecture hall seats.

Servant Leadership

Daystar University gtaught me the importance of expressing myself and respectfully disagreeing with opinions that i djid not subscribe to. The university taught me that as much as i am leader i should not be afraid to be hands on on any given task in life and work space. A servant leader leads by example and does not instill fear to those he is leading.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close