Tanta University vs Wellesley College vs Fordham University vs University of Houston–Clear Lake vs Swiss School of Management - SSM

Side-by-side comparison from 45 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Tanta University: wins 0/5 categories
Wellesley College: wins 0/5 categories
Fordham University: wins 0/5 categories
University of Houston–Clear Lake: wins 0/5 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 3/5 categories
Muhammad Nawaz Sharif University of Engineering & Technology: wins 0/5 categories
Texila American University: wins 2/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: BA in Humanities
Wellesley, Massachusetts, United States
3.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics and Statistics
New York City, United States
4.10
Read more reviews
28 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
Houston, Texas, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
East Bank Demerara, Guyana
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Category ratings
Facilities
2.56
3.67
4.14
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.67
3.67
4.75
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
3.40
4.33
4.39
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.80
4.00
4.18
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Student life
2.56
4.67
4.15
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
2.90
4.00
4.07
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
3.00
4.00
4.15
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive learning environment and dedicated professors
  • +Balance of academic and social life
  • +Positive overall experience and gratitude
  • +Strong sense of community and personal growth
  • +Academic challenge and opportunities
  • +Inclusive and diverse student body
  • +prime NYC location with diverse cultural and career opportunities
  • +strong support for academic and career success, including financial aid
  • +caring and dedicated professors and staff

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse student body and multicultural interactions
  • +Abundant resources and supportive lecturers
Cons
  • -Lack of practical learning and feedback.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
  • -Inadequate career and networking support for science students.
  • -High price point not justified by academic programs.

Nothing to show

  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -The curriculum is frequently perceived as irrelevant or too theoretical.
Rating summary
What students say

Across several key metrics, this institution presents a mixed performance. The highest-rated aspects are **Location** (3.67) and **Professors** (3.4). Conversely, **Facilities** and **Student Life** received the lowest scores, both at 2.56. **Accomodation** (3) and **Value** (2.9) fall in the middle range, with **Internationality** (2.8) slightly lower.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in student life, earning a high rating of 4.67. Professors are also highly regarded, scoring 4.33. Conversely, the university's facilities and location received the lowest scores, both at 3.67. Accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated solidly at 4, indicating a well-rounded experience with specific areas of notable excellence and room for improvement.

Considerably high ratings across surveyed aspects indicate a well-rounded university experience. The location stands out as the strongest attribute, receiving the highest score. Conversely, value for money, while still positive, is the lowest-rated category. Other areas such as professors, facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality all fall within a similar, positive range.

Nothing to show

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. However, its facilities received a zero rating, indicating a significant area for improvement. Accommodation and value for money are rated moderately, suggesting a balanced but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 40% of reviews are positive, praising the supportive academic environment and personal growth. However, approximately 10% of feedback highlights issues like insufficient practice and unhelpful student affairs.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, ~67% of feedback is positive, praising small classes, friendly students, and a strong sense of community. There are no negative reviews.

Most (around 96%) of reviews are positive, praising the New York City location, diverse opportunities, and academic instruction. One review noted a lack of support for science careers.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Students highlight a diversity of international students and available resources. Admin staff are noted for needing improvement.

Rating distribution
5★
20%
0%
21%
0%
100%
0%
100%
4★
20%
67%
71%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
33%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
10%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close