London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Kingston Business School vs Westminster Business School vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 348 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.70)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 4/7 categories
Kingston Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Westminster Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
London School of Design & Marketing - LSDM: wins 1/7 categories
Glion Institute of Higher Education - GIHE: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: University Pathway Programme
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
London, The United Kingdom
3.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Hospitality Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
5.00
Win
4.25
2.00
4.56
Not rated
3.71
Location
4.78
4.00
4.00
3.00
4.78
Win
Not rated
3.57
Professors
4.26
4.50
4.25
3.00
4.67
Win
4.00
4.57
Internationality
4.80
4.00
4.00
3.00
4.67
5.00
Win
4.86
Student life
3.63
4.50
Win
4.25
2.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.04
4.50
Win
4.25
3.00
4.00
4.00
3.57
Accommodation
3.79
4.50
Win
4.00
2.00
3.22
Not rated
3.83
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Marketable courses and high academic standards
  • +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
  • +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
  • +Great student life and personal development support
  • +Positive lecturer interaction and learning experiences
  • +Opportunities and a beautiful city for exploration
  • +Supportive & engaged faculty
  • +Academic growth & new learning opportunities
  • +Prestigious location & student support

Nothing to show

  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
  • +Engaging and effective learning platforms
  • +Up-to-date and high-quality course content
  • +Practical application through simulators
  • +Strong academic rigor and industry-connected learning
  • +Experienced and supportive faculty
  • +Hands-on experience and practical insights
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
  • -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
  • -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources impede learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum design fail to meet student needs.
  • -Inconvenient course scheduling and unclear academic policies.
  • -Insufficient and outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of engagement from faculty and limited career support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and guidance leaves students feeling unsupported.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and lack of clear guidance from staff are recurring complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.

This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in **Facilities** with a perfect score of 5. Professors, student life, accommodation, and value are also highly regarded, all receiving 4.5. While internationality and location are rated well at 4, they represent the areas with the least room for improvement.

Across multiple aspects, the institution receives commendable feedback. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are particularly strong areas, all scoring 4.25. Location and Accommodation are rated well at 4, with Internationality also receiving a solid 4 rating. The university demonstrates a consistent level of quality throughout these evaluated areas.

Nothing to show

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Exceptional internationality marks this institution's highest score. Professors also receive strong commendation, indicating a positive academic experience. Conversely, the university significantly underperforms in facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, suggesting these areas require substantial improvement. Value for money is rated positively, reflecting a good return for students despite the noted weaknesses.

This university demonstrates outstanding strengths in **Internationality**, receiving a near-perfect score. **Professors** are also highly rated, suggesting a strong academic core. Conversely, **Location** and **Value** present as the weakest areas, with the lowest ratings. Facilities, student life, and accommodation fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight great student life, the beautiful city, and excellent lecturer interaction, leading to personal development and ample opportunities.

All four reviews are positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight supportive staff and professors, academic growth opportunities, and manageable workloads as key strengths.

Nothing to show

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

The single review highlights a simple, effective learning platform with up-to-date, high-quality marketing content. Students appreciate the marketing simulator for practical application, resulting in a strong 4/5 average rating.

With a ~100% positive sentiment from 7 reviews and an average rating of 4/5, students praise Glion's academic rigor, hands-on learning, and career launch support. Some note limited student life budgets.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
50%
25%
0%
67%
0%
29%
4★
44%
50%
75%
0%
33%
100%
43%
3★
19%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
29%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close