Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management vs Growth Institute vs German International University - GIU vs Abia State University Uturu - ABSU vs Triatma Mulya University

Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: REGENT Business School - RBS (5.00)
Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management: wins 1/3 categories
Growth Institute: wins 0/3 categories
German International University - GIU: wins 0/3 categories
Abia State University Uturu - ABSU : wins 0/3 categories
Triatma Mulya University: wins 0/3 categories
REGENT Business School - RBS: wins 2/3 categories
Beijing Union University: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Austin, Texas, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Engineering Sciences
Best programme: Economics
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Durban, South Africa
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
5.00
3.70
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Location
5.00
Not rated
3.00
3.55
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Professors
4.50
Not rated
4.50
4.17
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
4.50
Not rated
4.50
3.70
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Student life
5.00
Not rated
3.00
4.38
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Value
5.00
Not rated
4.50
4.40
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.55
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong economics and business programs
  • +Supportive faculty and rigorous academics
  • +Excellent networking and location

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on learning and real-world projects
  • +Engaging coursework and exciting assignments
  • +Global student community and international experience
  • +Knowledgeable and dedicated lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and community
  • +Affordable tuition

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive lecturers & practical content
  • +Flexible online platform & diverse environment
  • +Value & solid learning experience
  • +Practical, application-oriented education
  • +Approachable and invested professors
  • +Friendly campus and industry connections
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent concern.
  • -A lack of essential resources and support systems hinders the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Disorganized administration and poor communication.
  • -Uninspiring and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are major concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and both accommodation and internationality also score highly with 4.5. The university's facilities are rated at a respectable 4, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects.

Nothing to show

An assessment of the university reveals particularly strong performance in facilities, professors, internationality, and value, all receiving high scores. Conversely, location, student life, and accommodation represent areas with comparatively lower ratings. The overall profile suggests a university excelling in academic and amenity aspects, while facing some challenges in its geographical placement and student experience offerings.

Assessing the institution's performance across various metrics reveals a diverse set of strengths and weaknesses. Student life emerges as the strongest area, with a notable 4.38 rating, closely followed by value at 4.4. Conversely, the university's location and accommodation received the lowest scores, both at 3.55. Professors and internationality are rated solidly in the mid-range.

Nothing to show

An outstanding evaluation showcases top marks in facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value, all receiving perfect scores. However, a significant area for improvement is accommodation, which received a score of zero. This indicates a need for considerable development in housing options to match the university's strengths in other aspects.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value all received excellent ratings of 4. Areas requiring more attention include facilities and accommodation, both scoring a moderate 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics and networking. Reviews commend knowledgeable faculty and rigorous coursework, though workload can be demanding.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, these two reviews are 100% positive. Students praise hands-on learning, real-world projects, and global experiences, noting excellent coursework and opportunities.

The university garners a 4.07/5 rating with approximately 74% of reviews being positive, highlighting approachable lecturers, a strong sense of community, and a solid academic foundation. A small percentage of feedback mentioned limited facilities.

Nothing to show

With one review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. The student praised flexibility, supportive lecturers, and practical content. No negative feedback was received.

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting practical, application-oriented education, approachable professors, and a supportive campus environment.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
50%
30%
0%
100%
0%
4★
50%
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

English and Literature

Studying English and Literature at ABSU was a transformative journey that extended far beyond the classroom. The program offered a deep dive into classic and contemporary works, fostering critical thinking and a profound appreciation for storytelling. The dedicated faculty(ELSA) as it was called encouraged thoughtful analysis and creative expression allowing me to connect literary themes with real world experiences. This course not only enriched my understanding of literature but also equipped me with essential communication and analytical skills that continue to shape my personal and professional life.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close