Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań - UAM vs Poznan University of Technology - PUT vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs WSB University - WSB vs Poznan University of Economics and Business - UEP

Side-by-side comparison from 156 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Poznan University of Economics and Business - UEP (4.50)
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań - UAM: wins 0/7 categories
Poznan University of Technology - PUT: wins 1/7 categories
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities: wins 0/7 categories
WSB University - WSB: wins 0/7 categories
Poznan University of Economics and Business - UEP: wins 3/7 categories
Poznan University of Medical Sciences - PUMS: wins 1/7 categories
Collegium Da Vinci: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and Management and Law
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Business Administration + Marketing
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.30
4.57
Win
4.25
4.00
4.44
3.89
4.00
Location
4.41
4.29
4.04
4.56
4.89
Win
4.33
4.67
Professors
4.21
4.43
4.32
4.11
4.78
Win
3.89
4.67
Internationality
4.05
4.14
4.18
4.44
3.89
4.78
Win
4.00
Student life
4.20
4.21
3.59
3.63
3.89
4.11
4.67
Win
Value
4.02
4.07
4.04
4.11
4.44
Win
3.89
4.33
Accommodation
4.12
3.93
3.44
3.56
4.11
4.11
4.67
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +World-class professors, knowledgeable and supportive mentors.
  • +Beautiful, nature-filled campus and vibrant student life.
  • +Supportive and inclusive academic environment with diverse opportunities.
  • +Practical teaching and research opportunities
  • +Industry connections and modern facilities
  • +English-taught programs and international environment
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Well-organized and relevant programs
  • +Positive learning environment and resources
  • +Practical focus and internship opportunities
  • +Flexible and hybrid learning formats
  • +Welcoming environment and competent staff
  • +Practical and theoretical education with understanding professors
  • +Affordable city and housing options with many student opportunities
  • +Extensive development and international study programs
  • +Practical training and hospital exposure
  • +Supportive and clear teaching methods
  • +International community and global career opportunities
  • +Practical, project-based learning and real-world competencies.
  • +Personalized academic and professional growth support.
  • +Inspiring, creative, and inclusive community atmosphere.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues impact program coordination and quality.
  • -Program relevance and curriculum offerings are not meeting student expectations.
  • -Lack of dedicated resources and minimal effort from professors are noted.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources impede learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support create a negative student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
  • -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Many students report outdated facilities and resources.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and organizational issues cause student stress.
  • -Disorganized administrative processes and unhelpful staff are frustrating.
  • -Outdated technology and limited resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and inconsistent policies cause confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

The university garners strong reviews across most aspects, with **Location** standing out as its highest-rated feature. Areas like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life** also receive very positive feedback. While **Value** and **Internationality** are rated lower than other categories, they still fall within a generally favorable range, indicating a solid overall university experience.

This institution garners excellent scores across several key areas. Facilities stand out with a near-perfect rating, closely followed by strong performance in Professors and Location. Student Life and Internationality also receive positive marks. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, which, while still respectable, shows a noticeable dip compared to other categories. Value for money is rated moderately well.

This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.

This institution receives commendations for its facilities and professors, both scoring a solid 4. The location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.56. Conversely, student life at 3.63 and accommodation at 3.56 represent the weakest aspects. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.44, and value for money is good at 4.11.

This institution receives particularly strong commendations for its **location**, earning the highest rating. Professors are also highly regarded. Areas that received lower scores include **student life** and **internationality**, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects. Other categories like facilities, accommodation, and value fall within a solid, positive range, suggesting a generally well-rounded university experience.

This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality**, which stands out as its strongest area. Location also receives a high rating, indicating positive aspects in these regards. Areas for potential improvement, based on the provided data, include Facilities, Professors, and Value, all receiving the lowest scores. Student Life and Accomodation are rated moderately well.

This institution garners high marks in several key areas, notably in **Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation**, all receiving an impressive average of 4.67. **Facilities** and **Internationality** are rated solidly at 4, while **Value** sits at a respectable 4.33. The weakest rated category is **Facilities**.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of 69 reviews are positive, highlighting world-class professors, a beautiful campus, and strong academic programs. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program coordination issues.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88% 4-5 stars), highlighting a modern campus, practical teaching, and strong industry connections. A small percentage of feedback (~12%) lacks negative commentary.

Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~78% of reviews are positive. Students highlight practical learning, internships, and flexible/hybrid class formats. Minor feedback mentions varied lecturer English proficiency and sometimes confusing program structure.

With an average rating of 4.45/5 from 11 reviews, approximately 91% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent professors, good class organization, and many development opportunities like Erasmus programs.

Approximately 89% of reviews are positive, praising development opportunities, practical training, and supportive staff. About 11% of feedback mentions organizational issues like overlapping classes and exams.

All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Reviews highlight practical, individualized education, project-based learning, and real-world competency development. Lecturers with business experience provide valuable hands-on insights.

Rating distribution
5★
28%
31%
44%
22%
55%
44%
33%
4★
55%
56%
49%
56%
36%
22%
67%
3★
14%
13%
3%
22%
9%
22%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
11%
0%
1★
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My opinion about Adam Mickiewicz University

In my opinion, Adam Mickiewicz University is a very solid institution, especially if you are interested in humanities, social sciences, or academic research. It has a good reputation, strong research facilities, and international connections, which provide significant opportunities for academic development. As for the drawbacks — the biggest challenges may be bureaucracy and administrative procedures, as well as the cost of accommodation, especially for international students. Therefore, it is worth carefully analyzing the faculties, the programme, and the housing options before starting your studies.

Nothing to show

Practical and modern

Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.

Nothing to show

Best decision in my life

Choosing this university was the best decision in my life. Poznań University of Economics and Business provides lots of opportunities to students. It allows students to go abroad to almost any country in the world. I have attented Erasmus at University of West London. I can honestly say that in my opinion PUEB is on very high level and take care of its students.

If you love medicine you will do it anyway!

Honestly, my love for medicine is what keeps me here. Going to a school in a different country you have to adapt to different customs and ways of doing things which is very different to how things are run in my home country. My issue with this school is the organisation, sometimes classes overlap, sometimes exams overlap with classes and students have to sort this out themselves, which should not be happening. Timetabling and exams shouldn't be the students' responsibility medicine are stressful as it is. As I said this is how things are run in this country.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close