University of California Los Angeles - UCLA vs Los Angeles Valley College - LAVC vs Hospitality Academy vs Los Angeles Film School - LAFS vs Mount Saint Mary University
Side-by-side comparison from 103 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and passionate professors
- +Strong academic programs and career development resources
- +Vibrant and connected campus community
Nothing to show
- +Flexible courses & supportive teachers
- +Career advancement & internship opportunities
- +Personal and professional growth
- +High-quality creative programs and equipment.
- +Supportive peer and mentor relationships.
- +Opportunities for growth and learning.
- +Individual student focus and professors fostering strengths in differences
Nothing to show
- +exceptional, supportive faculty
- +transformative, holistic program approach
- +intellectual rigor and personal growth
- -Poor course structure and content quality.
- -Ineffective teaching and support.
- -Administrative and facilities issues.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated course content and lack of practical training.
- -Poor communication and a feeling of being scammed.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often unengaging or irrelevant.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.
Remarkably high marks are evident across several key university metrics. Professors and facilities stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving scores above 4.46. Student life and value also score well. The weakest area, though still rated positively, is accommodation, with a score of 4.22. Internationality, while solid, is also among the lower-rated categories.
Nothing to show
A review of this university reveals a mixed but generally positive assessment. Its strongest areas are Student Life and Internationality, both scoring around 3.67. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3, while Professors and Value landed slightly higher at approximately 3.33.
This university garners excellent scores across most aspects, with accommodation and internationality standing out at an impressive 4.5. Facilities, location, and student life also receive high marks, all at 4. Value for money is rated a solid 4 as well. The only area slightly lower is professors, earning a respectable 3.5, indicating a good but not exceptional performance in this regard.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Its **Value** is also highly rated. While other areas like **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** all perform well with solid 4-star ratings, these represent the university's most balanced and slightly less outstanding aspects compared to its top-tier performance in teaching quality and global engagement.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, internationality, and value. These strengths suggest a robust academic environment with excellent accessibility and global outlook, all at a high value for students. Conversely, the university's weakest points are its facilities, student life, and accommodation, all of which scored zero. This indicates significant areas for improvement in campus infrastructure, social engagement, and housing provisions.
With ~94% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.27/5, students praise high quality education, approachable professors, and strong career development resources. Minimal negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive, highlighting career advancement, internships, and effective teaching. About 33% of feedback expressed disappointment with communication and outdated course content.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the growth and excellent animation course. Some note high tuition costs for creative programs.
With one review, the average rating is 4/5 stars. Positive feedback highlights personalized student focus and professors encouraging individual strengths. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review praises the transformative PhD program, highlighting exceptional faculty and unique educational approaches. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I genuinely wish I could leave a positive review about Hospitality Academy, but unfortunately, my experience has been incredibly disappointing and feels like a scam. They promised a hospitality certificate program with proper classes and training. I attended the first class, and after that—nothing. No follow-up, no new classes, and the content they provided was completely outdated, with videos from as far back as 2008. What’s worse is the complete lack of communication. I’ve reached out more than ten times via email and received no response. I also contacted my supposed advisor multiple times, and again—nothing. This level of unprofessionalism is unacceptable, especially from a company claiming to help professionals grow in the hospitality industry. I do not recommend this program to anyone. If you're serious about your education, go directly with accredited universities. It will save you time, money, and a lot of frustration.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
