EAE Business School vs Université de Cergy-Pontoise vs École d'ingénieurs du Numérique - ISEP vs University of Donja Gorica - UDG vs Università di Roma Tor Vergata - uniroma2
Side-by-side comparison from 144 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Expert tutors and practical, applicable knowledge
- +Comprehensive curriculum and flexible learning options
- +Supportive professors and environment
- +Engaging and diverse programs
- +Strong career integration and company links
- +Strong, practical academic curriculum and industry connections
- +Experienced and approachable professors
- +Good preparation for the job market
- +strong curriculum balance
- +dedicated and supportive faculty
- +opportunities for practical experience
- +Excellent career preparation and university reputation
- +Modern facilities and enriching academic/personal growth opportunities
- +Supportive environment, especially for international students
- +Practical, future-oriented curriculum with real-world application and leadership development
- +Supportive and accessible facilitators invested in student success
- +Innovative model fostering autonomy, critical thinking, and a strong pan-African network
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -The quality of education is criticized for being superficial and not job-preparatory.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are often found to be lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and insufficient support contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary stress.
- -Outdated facilities hinder effective learning and research.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency causes confusion.
- -Speedy courses with a lack of depth and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor administrative support and unmotivated professors.
- -Dilapidated and lacking infrastructure.
- -Outdated facilities and poor quality courses are a concern.
- -Inadequate instructor preparedness and pricing are issues.
- -Student safety and employee misconduct are significant problems.
Nothing to show
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Location**, achieving a score of 3.82. Conversely, its weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.07. Other aspects like Professor quality, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally consistent but not outstanding profile across the board.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, achieving a high rating of 4.25. Student life also scores well at 3.93, alongside a respectable value rating of 3.83. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the weakest area, with a score of 2.97. Professors, accommodation, and internationality fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential development.
This institution receives exceptional scores for its dedicated professors and excellent value, both earning a perfect 5. Its facilities are also highly regarded with a 4.5 rating. While student life, accommodation, internationality, and location all receive solid 4-star reviews, these represent the areas with the most room for improvement compared to the university's standout strengths.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **professors**, earning a strong 4.5 rating. **Facilities** also score well at 4. However, the **location** presents a significant weakness, with a low rating of 2.5. Other areas such as student life, accommodation, and internationality fall into a moderate range, indicating room for improvement in certain aspects. The overall **value** is positively rated at 4.
Internationality and Professors are the university's strongest rated areas. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Facilities, Student Life, and Value also demonstrate solid performance, while Location sits in the mid-range. The overall impression is one of a university excelling in academic and global aspects, with room for improvement in student housing.
This university demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in **Value** (4.53), **Location** (4.47), **Student Life** (4.47), and **Internationality** (4.47). Professors also receive high marks at 4.33. The weakest area surveyed is **Accomodation**, rated at 4, while Facilities are also solid at 4.24.
Nothing to show
Approximately 65% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable skills, multicultural environments, and expert tutors. A smaller portion, around 13%, expresses concerns regarding class depth and administrative responsiveness.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise the supportive environment, quality teaching, and professional integration. Some mention administrative issues, while ~0% expressed strong negative sentiment.
With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, student feedback is entirely positive. Recurring themes highlight the academic curriculum and industry connections, as well as practical, job-market-focused courses taught by experienced professors.
With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, students highlight a good balance of theory and practical skills, and supportive faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~84% of reviews are positive, highlighting comprehensive programs, excellent preparation, and modern facilities. A small portion (~4.6%) express concerns about rushed courses and lack of depth.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising the university's practical, leadership-focused curriculum and supportive environment. A small percentage mention concerns about course quality and administrative communication.
Nothing to show
I am deeply disappointed with my experience at EAE Business School. I regret wasting both my time and money on this institution, and I feel compelled to share my experience to help others avoid making the same mistake. First and foremost, it is evident that students' concerns and issues are not a priority for EAE. The administration's lack of response and follow-up on critical matters is appalling. I have had to chase them multiple times for essential documents, and even then, they failed to deliver. For instance, I needed an academic confirmation for my visa renewal. Despite my persistent efforts and numerous emails, I have yet to receive this crucial document. Their standard response is a simple "okay," but no real action is taken, leaving students in limbo. Academically, the situation is equally disheartening. Although I was enrolled in an English-taught program, I can confidently say that at least 90% of the professors lacked proficiency in English. Their inability to communicate effectively and convey the course material was a significant barrier to learning. Moreover, it seemed that many of the instructors lacked the necessary knowledge and expertise in their respective fields. It appears that the hiring standards at EAE do not prioritize the academic qualifications or language skills of their faculty, which severely undermines the quality of education provided. The overall environment at EAE feels more like a daycare center than a reputable business school. The lack of professionalism, coupled with inadequate academic support, makes it clear that the institution does not take the education of its students seriously. The administration's disregard for students' needs and the subpar teaching quality make it impossible to recommend this school to anyone. In conclusion, attending EAE Business School has been a colossal waste of time and money. If you value your time, money, and education, I strongly advise you to look elsewhere. Do not make the mistake of enrolling in this institution.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The University of Rome tor Vergata is a great and relevantly young University, which is becoming each academic year stronger and more valuable. I graduated from the Global Governance bachelor's degree in English which presented a very interdisciplinary, interconnected and international programme to its students. It is focused on the great challenges and relevant matters of nowadays' world, which shape a strong basis for the next generations of workers and leaders of the upcoming years.
My experience at African Leadership University has been extremely positive. I am studying Computer Science, and I appreciate how the programme combines strong technical foundations with leadership, problem-solving, and real-world application. The curriculum is practical and future-oriented, encouraging students to think critically, collaborate, and apply what they learn to real challenges. The lecturers are supportive, approachable, and genuinely invested in student success. Classes are interactive, and there is a strong emphasis on teamwork, projects, and continuous learning rather than rote memorization. Beyond academics, ALU’s diverse and inclusive community creates a supportive environment where students from different backgrounds learn from each other. Campus life is engaging, with opportunities for leadership, innovation, and personal growth. I would definitely recommend ALU to students who are looking for a modern education that prepares them not just for exams, but for impactful careers and leadership in Africa and beyond.
Nothing to show
