Dublin Institute of Technology - DIT vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Trinity Business School vs ICD Business School Dublin vs American College Dublin - ACD
Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, applied learning with real-world focus.
- +Accessible faculty and strong student support.
- +Central location and active academic atmosphere.
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Strong sense of community and inclusive environment
- +Opportunities for networking and professional growth
- +Supportive and collaborative atmosphere
Nothing to show
- +Passionate and supportive faculty with personalized attention
- +Strong focus on student success and career development
- +Welcoming city environment and convenient accommodations
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world applications.
- +Broad, interdisciplinary courses fostering transferable skills.
- +Engaging, supportive lecturers and modern facilities.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant issue.
- -Administrative and management inefficiencies cause frequent frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Lack of resources & support
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and financial mismanagement, including delayed refunds and staff turnover.
- -Concerns about academic stability and frequent changes in teaching staff.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score. Professors and internationality are also positively rated, alongside a solid showing for value and facilities. Overall, the university offers a generally favorable experience, though areas for improvement, particularly in housing, are evident.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Exceptional marks are awarded for **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation**, all receiving a perfect score. The university also fares well in **Internationality** and **Value**, both rated a solid 4. The **Location** is its least high-scoring aspect, though still considered good at a 4.
Nothing to show
This institution's strengths lie in its **Professors**, with a solid rating of 3.86, and its **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring 3.71. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include **Facilities** and **Student Life**, each receiving a 2.87 rating. **Location** and **Accommodation** fall in the mid-range, with scores of 3.2 and 2.93 respectively.
Nothing to show
Examining the provided ratings, the university excels in areas like **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring well over 4.0. **Location** and **Value** also present strong points for the institution. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating a significant area for improvement. **Student Life** and **Facilities** fall in the mid-range, suggesting moderate satisfaction in these aspects.
With ~76% positive reviews and an average of 4.06/5, students highlight practical learning, helpful faculty, and strong community. No negative feedback was reported.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a strong sense of community and a supportive, inclusive environment. Positive feedback emphasizes networking and personal/professional growth opportunities.
Nothing to show
Most (approximately 86%) of the 14 reviews are highly positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive faculty, small class sizes, and career development. A small percentage (~7%) of feedback mentioned financial issues and staff retention.
Nothing to show
Around 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting a practical approach, engaging lecturers, and valuable real-world skills. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show