United International Business Schools - UIBS vs ISG International Business School vs Ryukoku University vs Ritsumeikan University vs Kyoto University

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ryukoku University (5.00)
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 1/6 categories
ISG International Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Ryukoku University: wins 0/6 categories
Ritsumeikan University: wins 2/6 categories
Kyoto University: wins 3/6 categories
Sol Plaatje University: wins 0/6 categories
Doshisha University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Intercultural Communication
Best programme: Computer Science with Data Science
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Kimberley, South Africa
4.30
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts and Humanities
Best programme: Commerce
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
4.75
4.33
2.00
Location
4.75
4.50
4.00
4.33
5.00
Win
4.33
2.67
Professors
4.75
Win
4.50
4.00
4.67
4.50
4.57
2.00
Internationality
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.00
3.75
3.29
3.33
Student life
4.25
4.25
4.00
4.67
5.00
Win
4.29
2.33
Value
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.67
Win
4.50
4.43
2.33
Accommodation
4.00
3.25
3.00
4.33
4.75
Win
4.00
2.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
  • +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
  • +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
  • +Diverse cultural environment and international community
  • +Supportive professors and valuable friendships
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and future career development
  • +**Personal growth and career improvement:** Students highlight significant personal development, a changed mindset, and improved career prospects.
  • +**Diverse and international environment:** Appreciation for the multicultural atmosphere, opportunities to connect with international students, and learning diverse languages.
  • +**Engaging student life and supportive professors:** Positive experiences with extracurricular activities, social events, and well-educated, experienced faculty.
  • +Academic freedom and research opportunities
  • +Talented and stimulating peers
  • +Prestigious reputation and strong programs
  • +Supportive lecturers and academic environment
  • +Modern facilities and inclusive campus
  • +Practical learning for career readiness
  • +Strong internationalization efforts
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a major concern.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative disorganization and unfulfilled school services.
  • -Outdated curriculum and ineffective teaching.
  • -Lack of career advancement opportunities post-graduation.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.

This university garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a perfect score. **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value** all receive strong ratings of 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, both rated at 3.

This university receives excellent marks across multiple categories. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Internationality, both scoring a perfect 5. Student Life and Value also stand out with very high ratings. Location and Accommodation are solid, though they represent the weakest aspects compared to other metrics. Professors' ratings are also highly favorable.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect 5 for both Location and Student Life. Facilities and Accommodations also stand out with strong ratings of 4.75. The university performs well in its academic offerings, with Professors rated at 4.5, matched by its Value. Conversely, Internationality is its comparatively weakest point, receiving a 3.75.

This institution demonstrates a strong academic environment, with professors receiving the highest marks at 4.57. Facilities and location also score well, both at 4.33. Student life is rated positively at 4.29, and value for money is a notable strength at 4.43. Accommodation is rated at a solid 4.0. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.29.

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. Its strongest point is **Internationality**, receiving a significantly higher rating than other categories. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Professors** are identified as the weakest aspects, both scoring at the lowest mark. Student life, accommodation, and value also fall within a similar moderate range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.

The sole review is positive, rating the university 5/5. This feedback highlights opportunities to discover Japanese culture, meet diverse students and professors, and gain international experience.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight thrilling experiences, satisfaction with outcomes, happy student life, and a positive impact on their mindset and careers. Diversity, international connections, and social life are also appreciated.

Students highly praise the university, with 100% of feedback being positive. Recurring themes include academic freedom, stimulating intellectual environments, and excellent research opportunities. The average rating is a strong 4.75/5.

University reviews show strong satisfaction, with approximately 100% positive feedback. Students praise dedicated lecturers, modern facilities, and a supportive environment fostering personal and professional growth.

With an average rating of 2/5, ~67% of reviews are negative. Students cite disorganization, outdated curriculum, and lack of career advancement. One positive review notes internationalization efforts.

Rating distribution
5★
75%
50%
100%
67%
75%
43%
0%
4★
0%
50%
0%
33%
25%
43%
33%
3★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Communication and Planning

Their method of communication is clashing, it is not directed to specific people or departments. Academic events clash with classes, which makes it difficult for students to attend important events. Yes I would recommend it to only those who are good decision makers who can properly prioritise.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close