Universidad Autónoma del Caribe - AC vs Middlesex University - MDX vs Federal University Oye Ekiti - FUOYE vs Accra Institute of Technology vs Østfold University College

Side-by-side comparison from 234 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Middlesex University - MDX (4.20)
Universidad Autónoma del Caribe - AC: wins 0/7 categories
Middlesex University - MDX: wins 4/7 categories
Federal University Oye Ekiti - FUOYE: wins 1/7 categories
Accra Institute of Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Østfold University College: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
4.20
Top
Read more reviews
161 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: International Peace and Security
Best programme: Electrical and Control Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.25
Win
3.59
2.00
4.00
Location
Not rated
4.06
Win
3.52
Not rated
4.00
Professors
Not rated
4.26
Win
4.21
4.00
3.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.23
Win
3.58
3.00
4.00
Student life
Not rated
4.19
3.97
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
Not rated
4.06
4.15
Win
2.00
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.65
3.61
1.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, relevant, and industry-standard course content
  • +Passionate, supportive, and approachable lecturers
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and vibrant campus community
  • +Quality education and committed lecturers
  • +Conducive and lively learning environment
  • +Affordable cost of living
  • +Engaging and effective teaching methods
  • +Supportive and accessible instructors
  • +Excellent career development support
  • +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
  • +Balanced theory and lab work focus
  • +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized as being ineffective.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient learning spaces.
  • -Sexually harassing lecturers and biased grading systems.
  • -Extortionate practices and transportation issues with local communities.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and limited technology are concerns.
  • -The class system is considered insufficient.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Surveyed metrics indicate a generally positive university experience. Professors and Internationality received the highest marks, both above 4.2. Facilities and Student Life also scored well, exceeding 4.1. Location and Value were rated respectably around 4.0. The weakest area, Accommodation, scored significantly lower at 3.6.

Across surveyed categories, the university demonstrates strong performance in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring over 4.0. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating, with **Facilities** and **Internationality** also falling below 3.6. Student Life and Accommodation present a more moderate standing. Overall, academic and financial aspects are highly regarded, while physical infrastructure and geographic positioning show room for improvement.

This institution excels in academics and social engagement, with particularly strong ratings for **Professors** and **Student Life**. Conversely, its weakest areas are **Location** and **Accomodation**, both receiving the lowest possible scores. Facilities and overall value are rated moderately. Internationality is a mid-range strength, indicating a solid but not outstanding global presence.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With a 4.24 average rating from 161 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students praise practical course content, passionate lecturers, and a good campus vibe. No negative reviews were recorded.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality education, committed lecturers, and a conducive learning environment. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with facilities and unstable power/internet.

The single review (100% negative) suggests administrative issues despite brilliant teachers and good courses. The student experienced a slightly poor administration system.

With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
35%
30%
0%
0%
4★
0%
53%
41%
0%
100%
3★
0%
11%
24%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
1%
100%
0%
1★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

teachers

most teachers are very patient when helping and explaining to student with questions, the time table planning is not great, responsible team is only accepting online request which the reply was always unable to make changes(except health related issues )

FASTEST GROWING UNIVERSITY

FUOYE, is the fastest growing university in Nigeria and has helped a lot of graduates achieve their dream. I'm very happy to be part of this innovation. The school is a Great school for aspiring university students

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close