EBS European Business School vs University of Paderborn vs LUISS Business School vs Schellhammer Business School vs Federal University of Technology Owerri - FUTO
Side-by-side comparison from 99 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Enthusiastic and supportive professors
- +Outstanding international environment
- +Strong academic programs and challenging coursework
- +Vibrant campus life and supportive environment
- +English-taught courses and good facilities
- +Strong career focus and job market alignment
- +Caring professors and engaging learning experiences
- +International environment and practical application
- +International environment and diverse professors
- +Attractive location and lifestyle
- +Engaging lectures and beneficial academic programs
- +Strong technology and engineering programs
- +Rigorous academics and practical skill development
- +Dedicated lecturers and personal growth opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Supportive faculty and engaging learning environment
- +Welcoming international community and diverse opportunities
- +Modern, well-equipped campus facilities and comfortable accommodations
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -Negative interactions with instructors and poor course structure are frustrating.
- -Administrative and support issues are a significant concern.
- -Professors are unresponsive and unhelpful.
- -Obscure and unclear regulations cause confusion.
- -Poor organization and low-level course content.
- -Ineffective student coordination and support.
- -Lack of planning and poor execution of program elements.
- -Administrative and management issues lead to inconsistent practices and poor communication.
- -Lack of accreditation and recognition invalidates degrees and wastes money.
- -Unreliable course delivery and abrupt program changes disregard student efforts.
- -Outdated technology and poor infrastructure.
- -Excessive workload and insufficient time for assignments.
- -Bureaucratic and inefficient administrative processes.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of resources and insufficient support hinder learning.
Across the board, this institution receives perfect scores in all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. This suggests an exceptionally strong offering with no discernible weaknesses according to these ratings. The university appears to excel uniformly, providing an outstanding experience in every dimension.
With a solid average rating, the university shines particularly bright in its **Internationality** (4.2), **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value** (all 4). These aspects suggest a welcoming and engaging environment with good overall worth. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** received slightly lower, though still respectable, scores of 3.6, indicating areas where improvements could be considered.
This university is distinguished by exceptional ratings in its **Location**, scoring an impressive 4.58. Its **Facilities** also received a strong evaluation at 4.17. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are **Accomodation**, rated at 2.92, and **Student Life**, with a score of 3.25. **Professors** and **Value** are moderately rated, while **Internationality** sits at a decent 3.58.
Analysis of university ratings reveals a varied picture. The institution excels in **Internationality**, receiving a strong 2.89. Conversely, **Value** is the weakest area, scoring a low 1.67. Other aspects, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation, fall within a similar moderate range, generally around the 2.0 mark.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in value, receiving a perfect score. Its strongest performing academic area is professors, with a commendable 3.85 rating. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring a considerably lower 2.93. Other aspects like student life, location, accommodation, and internationality fall within a moderate to good range, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
Outstanding scores characterize this institution, particularly in areas like Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations, all receiving perfect marks. Facilities, Location, and Internationality also fare well with strong ratings. The Value proposition is rated positively, indicating a solid overall offering.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight an enthusiastic and supportive faculty, and outstanding internationalism.
Four out of five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.2/5. Students highlight a good campus and student life, with many English-taught courses and supportive staff. One review expressed significant dissatisfaction with support staff and professors.
With 5 out of 12 reviews being positive, students highlight smooth admissions, well-organized programs aligned with the job market, and an international environment. One review mentioned organizational gaps and a need for more versatile examples.
Negative feedback dominates, with ~56% of reviews expressing significant dissatisfaction regarding academic recognition and inconsistent practices. Positive comments highlight location and international atmosphere.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting rigorous technology and engineering programs and personal development. A small percentage (~4%) of negative feedback mentions slow administrative processes and outdated facilities.
Nothing to show
With one review, this university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The sole feedback highlights a very positive experience, praising the modern learning environment, supportive faculty, and good campus facilities like dorms and libraries.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The first half of the year the program is very basic, this is done in hopes of having all students with the same base knowledge but unfortunately, students with a business/economics background have no engagement or academic challenge as these courses cover the introduction of management courses very briefly.
I have just done my Masters at SBS (MA in Organisational Psychology) and below I want to provide the full, unfortunately not so positive, picture. I have no clue where all the positive reviews are coming from – most likely they are paying for them as 99% of them do not reflect reality at all. As it doesn't fit in 1 review, I will split it, to offer the full picture. Contact me if you’d like to know more. Let's start positively – I have met several very knowledgeable and nice people among the teachers. Some are truly willing to teach you and help you grow. But do note that these people are not paid enough and outside of their actual teaching hours which means you will receive little to no support outside class unless the teacher is willing to go the extra mile with no compensation. This is where the „positives“ end. Organisationally – tuition fees are unclear, they will charge you whatever they can get away with based on your nationality (e.g. Mozambique 700eur to Netherlands 12000eur so quite the range) and you will find out randomly when you talk to your peers after enrolling. This will be labelled as „scholarship“ but it doesn’t have anything to do with your previous grades or performance. Everything is payable as opposed to standard practice in serious academic institutions - for example if you need thesis deadline extension, it is, of course, possible - for about 2K EUR. Everything and anything you pay them is non-refundable, of course. There is also insanely high staff turnover, as usually the better teachers leave the moment they find a better job in the area - often these teachers must teach there because the job market in Malaga/Cadiz province is ridiculously saturated and it is not easy to find another employment. Career days are a joke – people from hotels come to recruit cheap labour (600eur/month internship or unpaid at all) but no real professional opportunities are offered – if by some miracle you find anything suitable for you, the uni will charge you money as they have „provided“ you with this opportunity. Personally I was advised and referred several times by a staff member who went the extra mile with my CV and job applications but this is not the norm, as they definitely don't have the resources to do this for everyone. Academically – they should not have the right to call themselves a higher educational institution. There is no clear curriculum, they are changing subjects all the time – if you dared to apply it will certainly not be the same subjects as are listed on the website. For which they have a little legal note written there but that is just to cover their behinds obviously. Teachers are preparing their own syllabus with almost a free-hand, often far from what would be challenging on an actual Masters academical level. Unfortunately, AI use for cheating purposes is not strictly punished - oftentimes students will get away with it despite the instructors' full awareness of this practice, as the instructors do not have the resources to penalise everyone for it as would be the standard practice in any other reputable academic institution. It's very demotivating to be putting in organic, honest work while many just pass by using AI for every single thought they're supposed to produce scot-free. Language classes are a joke – they do not offer ANY of the languages listed online as they do not have the teachers for them. There is a Spanish class – divided between beginners and those who have already come across it, so if you’d think of improving your Spanish from B2 and higher level - don‘t even think about it as the „non-beginner“ class will not be challenging enough by far. There are English classes which are „mandatory“ for students with lack of English skills but again, no courses on e.g. Business English provided, which are a standard at other universities. Thesis writing is an absolute chaos. The guidelines are extremely vague and sometimes conflicting with what is said in class. Do not expect actual academic support – you will choose your topic and you’ll be asigned „Thesis Advisor“ which will be one of the underpaid teachers who will NOT be informed of this assignment and thus will NOT be compensated for it (as they are only paid for teaching hours and not full-time). This means that depending on your TA you will either receive some minor support out of the potential „goodness“ of the specific teacher but in reality, all is decided and „reviewed“ by the Dean - currently Prof. Sousa. „Reviewed“ is because he will only judge based on whether you have followed their template mainly regarding formatting but not content. Which means when you ask for feedback on your 60 page document you’ll often receive „Please follow the template“ which will get your thesis to „passing“ grade but if you want to actually better yourself in academic research and writing, don’t expect that here since their regular procedure doesn't strive to help every student get to their best. Grading is thus based not on content or someone actually thoroughly reading your thesis (nor there are clear grading guidelines as is more than common in other universities). Facilities – the building on campus is okay, but doesn‘t reflect the tuition amount at all. It is far from everything which means you either have to pay for school bus (expensive), figure out Spanish public transport (bus is about 7min walk) or have a car/motorcycle. There is a cafe on campus which is owned by the owners of SBS with a minor discount for SBS students but that means that there is not even a microwave or water kettle available for students - so that they would go spend money in that cafe if they want to have hot meal during their day. For people considering to apply: please be warned – if you can choose another institution for your development, do so. This university will not challenge you academically nor professionaly. It is a deceiving marketing practice at the very least – scam is the correct word unfortunately. Students that were seen sleeping/obviously using AI to answer absolutely basic (definitely not Masters level of knowledge required) questions asked by teachers IN CLASS then use AI to write on their LinkedIn how enriching and challenging this experience was after their graduation. Moreover, the university praises and advocates for the above mentioned fake social media behaviour even though they are well-aware of the scam they are running and the quality of students they enroll – no entrance exams required, of course. In fact, the university administration used AI to prepare their graduation speech for last year :) Make of that what you will. If you have applied and now cannot go back as you would loose all the tuition fees paid: challenge yourself during this time. Make sure to do all your courses diligently so that you can make the most out of this experience focusing on your academic growth. Ask an external thesis advisor to guide you if you want to actually improve your academic research and writing skills. Do the voluntary tasks during the courses, ask the teachers you deem knowledgeable and interesting for more info about their field of expertise, additional literature etc. You have to make it count yourself, as no one else will in this place – once you paid, your growth and development is irrelevant to the university with the exception of a few staff members that care. I have also submitted this review via Google, see how they don't reply as opposed to the positive ones, because they know all of the above is true :)
I love the way lecturers are dedicated I wish the infrastructures will be improved I love the disciplinary measures I hope Moore investigations will be conducted before disciplining a student FUTO 👍👍
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
