ESAD Escola Superior de Arte Dramático de Galicia vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad Nacional de Tucumán - UNT vs Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University vs ESLSCA Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 81 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent teachers and academic support leading to great results.
- +Pleasant and clean campus environment.
- +Affordable food options.
- +Strong academic programs with industry-experienced professors
- +Flexible schedules supporting work-study balance
- +Good job prospects and practical preparation for the professional market
- +High-quality education and qualified instructors
- +Excellent student support and personalized attention
- +Wide range of courses and training opportunities
- +High-quality, dedicated, and well-equipped academic staff
- +Strong focus on student success and support
- +Excellent language teaching and promising future job opportunities
- +Prime Paris location & modern facilities
- +Strong alumni network for internships & career support
- +Diverse, practical teaching and helpful administration
- +Welcoming community and supportive atmosphere
- +High-quality academics and engaging instructors
- +Diverse opportunities for personal and academic growth
- +Scenic and well-equipped campus facilities
- +Highly regarded specific schools and programmes
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major concerns.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as unsatisfactory.
- -Poor management and communication, particularly concerning administrative tasks.
- -Outdated curriculum and overly long program duration.
- -Unattractive facilities and uninspiring campus environment.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Lack of practical application
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -A lack of available resources and support services is frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of engagement and support from instructors is a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with a lack of communication and administrative support.
- -Overcrowded classes and limited course availability create significant frustrations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
This institution achieves exceptional scores in several key areas, notably in its **professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect marks. Its facilities are also rated highly. The primary area for potential improvement lies in **accommodation**, which received a moderate rating compared to the other exceptional categories.
This institution receives its highest marks for location, followed closely by professors and value. Conversely, its internationality rating is notably the lowest among the surveyed categories. Facilities and accommodation also received mid-range scores, while student life achieved a respectable standing.
This institution receives excellent marks for student life and value, both scoring a perfect 5. Professors and location are also highly regarded, with ratings of 4.67. Internationality scores a respectable 3.67, while facilities are rated at 4. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a rating of 2.67.
This university garners strong ratings across nearly all aspects. Its professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Facilities, location, student life, internationality, and value also score highly. Accommodation is also rated positively, though it is the lowest-scoring area.
This university shines in areas such as location and student life, both earning a strong 4.6 rating. Professors also receive high marks at 4.2. Conversely, accommodation presents a significant weakness, scoring a low 2.5. Internationality is rated moderately at 3, and facilities are average at 3.8. Overall value for money is rated at 3.6.
Overall, the university receives favorable ratings, with its strongest areas being **Professors** (4.35) and **Location** (4.23). **Internationality** (4.22) also scores well. The weakest aspect identified is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.78, while **Student Life** (4.04) and **Facilities** (4.13) are also areas for potential improvement. **Value** received a solid 4.0 rating.
This institution garners significant praise in several key areas. Its accommodation and professor quality stand out with perfect scores. Facilities and student life are also rated highly. However, its location receives a more moderate assessment, suggesting it might be an area for potential improvement or consideration by prospective students. The university also demonstrates good internationality and provides solid value for its students.
With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights excellent teachers, a good campus, and affordable amenities. There is no negative feedback to report.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good education and job prospects, often with experienced professors. ~14% of feedback is negative, citing outdated curricula, poor management, and unappealing infrastructure.
With 3 positive reviews and an average rating of 4.67/5, students praise excellent education quality, qualified teachers, and supportive study environments. Infrastructure issues were mentioned in one review.
With a ~100% positive sentiment and an average rating of 4.68/5, students highlight excellent teaching staff and strong job opportunities. Some minor improvements for lab facilities were noted.
Reviews are highly positive, with ~80% of feedback being 4-5 stars. Students highlight the quality of the educational team, good campus facilities, and a strong alumni network that aids in finding internships. Some noted a desire for greater depth in certain courses.
With an average rating of 4.39/5 from 23 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students highlight a welcoming atmosphere, strong sense of community, and rewarding academic and social experiences.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has overwhelmingly positive reviews. Students praise its scenic, spacious main campus and renowned Schools of Electronics and Information, and Medicine. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
AYBÜ SFL has very successful and well-equipped teachers, and the goodness of these teachers is more important to us than anything else in the school. Especially our teacher Dilek İşler Hayrili is a beyond perfect person, both her academic knowledge, her guidance and her communication with the students are simply magnificent. He is the greatest chance you will encounter throughout your education life. I would like to thank Yıldırım Beyazıt University for having such wonderful teachers and giving us this opportunity.
Business school whose campus is located in the heart of Paris. Quality educational team, premises for courses and also for numerous sports, cultural, business associations, etc. School which has a very numerous and very efficient network of alumni. This makes it easier to find internships and dissertation supervisors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
